ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Exploratory text mining of ocean law to measure overlapping agency and jurisdictional authority
Full text PdfPdf (534 KB)
Source
dg.o; Vol. 289 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international conference on Digital government research table of contents
Montreal, Canada
SESSION: Research papers and management, case study & policy papers: regulations and laws table of contents
Pages 53-62  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-099-9
Authors
Julia A. Ekstrom  University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
Gloria T. Lau  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Sponsors
: Routledge
: Elsevier
: Springer
: Cefrio
NCDG : National Center for Digital Government
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe an innovative application of mining laws to identify and measure overlapping jurisdictions of government agencies. Laws (statutes and regulations) were used to represent ocean and coastal management for four geopolitical jurisdictions of federal and state levels (Washington, Oregon, and California). We developed preliminary metrics of overlap based on the number of statutes, regulations, and agencies associated with any given topic. The utility of these metrics was tested on 46 topics representing a range of activities and resources across ocean-related sectors within the geographic scope of laws investigated. We found the preliminary results of the overlaps metrics to reveal results similar to a recent review of federal ocean management. In addition, a network diagram graphical display of the data revealed multiple dimensions to facilitate interpretation of results.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baron, J. R. and Thompson, P. The Search Problem: Posed by Large Heterogeneous Data Sets in Litigation: Possible Future Approaches to Research. Stanford, CA, 2007.
 
2
Borgatti, S. P. NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software. Analytic Technologies, Natick, MA, 2002.
 
3
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Freeman, L. C. Unicet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Inc., Natick, MA, 2002.
 
4
Cortner, H. J., Wallace, M. G., Burke, S. and Moote, M. M. Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 40, 1--3 (1998), 159--166.
 
5
Crowder, L., Osherenko, G., Young, O., Airame, S., Norse, E. A., Baron, N., Day, J. C., Douvere, F., Ehler, C. N., Halpern, B. S., Langdon, S. J., McLeod, K. L., Ogden, J. C., Peach, R. E., Rosenberg, A. A. and Wilson, J. A. Resolving Mismatches in U.S. Ocean Governance. Science, 313, 5787 (2006), 617--618.
 
6
Ekstrom, J. A. Evaluating Current Ocean Management Systems to Facilitate the Development of Ecosystem-Based Management. Book of Abstracts of the California and World Ocean Conference, Long Beach, CA. 2006.
 
7
International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law http://www.iaail.org.
 
8
Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2004.
 
9
 
10
Lluch-Belda, D., Luch-Cota, D. B. and Luch-Cota, S. E. Interannual Variability Impacts on the California Current Large Marine Ecosystem: Trends in Exploration, Protection, and Research. Elsevier, Boston, 2003.
 
11
McArdle, D. A. California marine protected areas. California Sea Grant, University of California, La Jolla, 1997.
 
12
McLeod, K. L., Lubchenco, J., Palumbi, S. R. and Rosenberg, A. A. Scientific Consensus Statement on Marine Ecosystem-Based Management, 2005.
13
 
14
Sherman, K. The Large Marine Ecosystem Concept: Research and Management Strategy for Living Marine Resources. Ecological Applications, 1, 4 (1991), 349--360.
 
15
Sherman, K. The Large Marine Ecosystem Approach for Assessment and Management of Ocean Coastal Waters. Elsevier, Boston, 2005.
 
16
U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy (USCOP). An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century Final Report of the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Final Report. Washington, D.C. (http://www.oceancommission.gov). 2004.
 
17
Wang, H. Ecosystem Management and Its Application to Large Marine Ecosystems: Science, Law, and Politics. Ocean Development and International Law, 35(2004), 41--74.
 
18
Young, O. R. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Julia A. Ekstrom: colleagues
Gloria T. Lau: colleagues