Acquisition of a vernacular gazetteer from web sources

ABSTRACT

Vernacular place names are names that are commonly in use to refer to geographical places. For purposes of effective information retrieval, the spatial extent associated with these names should be able to reflect people's perception of the place, even though this may differ sometimes from the administrative definition of the same place name. Due to their informal nature, vernacular place names are hard to capture, but methods to acquire and define vernacular place names are of great benefit to search engines and all kind of information services that deal with geographic data. This paper discusses the acquisition of vernacular use of place names from web sources and their representation as surface models derived by kernel density estimators.

REFERENCES

• 1: Chris Brunsdon, Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: an adaptive kernel algorithm, Computers & Geosciences, v.21 n.7, p.877-894, Aug. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0098-3004(95)00020-9]
• 2: Evans, A. J. and T. Waters, Mapping Vernacular Geography: Web-based GIS Tools for Capturing 'Fuzzy' or 'Vague' Entities, in International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2007. p. 134--150.
• 3: Jones, C. B., et al., Modelling Vague Places with Knowledge from the Web, in International Journal of Geographic Information Systems.
• 4: Montello, D. R., et al., Where's downtown?: Behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries, in Spatial Cognition and Computation. 2003. p. 185--204.
• 5: O' Sullivan David and Unwin, D. J., Geographic Information Analysis. 2002: Wiley.
• 6: Robert C. Pasley , Paul D. Clough , Mark Sanderson, Geo-tagging for imprecise regions of different sizes, Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Geographical information retrieval, November 09-09, 2007, Lisbon, Portugal [doi>10.1145/1316948.1316969]
• 7: Rosch, E., Cognition and Categorization, E. L. B. B. Rosch, Editor. 1978, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers. p. 27--48.
• 8: Schockaert, S., M. D. Cock, and E. E. Kerre, Automatic Acquisition of Fuzzy Footprints, in OTM 2005 Workshops (SeBGIS 2005). 2005. p. 1077--1086.
• 9: Steven Schockaert , Martine De Cock, Neighborhood restrictions in geographic IR, Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, July 23-27, 2007, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/1277741.1277772]
• 10: Silverman, B. W., Density estimation: for statistics and data analysis, ed. Chapman and Hall. 1986, London.
• 11: Thurstain-Goodwin, M. and D. Unwin, Defining and delineating the central areas of towns for statistical monitoring using continuous surface representations, in Transactions in GIS. 2000. p. 305--317.
• 12: Zelinsky, W., North America's vernacular regions, in Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1980. p. 1--16.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

General Terms:
Algorithms, Experimentation, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
geographic information retrieval, vernacular geography, web mining