ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Core geographical concepts: case Finnish geo-ontology
Full text PdfPdf (273 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 300 archive
Proceedings of the first international workshop on Location and the web table of contents
Beijing, China
Pages 57-60  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-160-6
Authors
Riikka Henriksson  Helsinki University of Technology, TKK
Tomi Kauppinen  Helsinki University of Technology and University of Helsinki, TKK
Eero Hyvönen  Helsinki University of Technology and University of Helsinki, TKK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367798.1367807
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper examines 1) the scope of geo-ontologies used for the purposes of information retrieval on the Web, 2) the core geographical concepts and their mutual relations, and 3) the properties the concepts have. Furthermore, we present the Finnish geo-ontology (Suomalainen paikkaontologia, SUO) and discuss the theories and principles that have governed the development process, as well as the limitations and requirements the use of geographical dictionaries as an instance data source have imposed to the content and the structure of SUO.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Arpinar, B., Sheth, A., Ramakrishnan, C., Usery, E. L, Azami, M. and M. Kwan (2006). Geospatial Ontology Development and Semantic Analytic. Transactions in GIS 10 (4), pp. 551--575.
 
2
Berners-Lee T., J. Hendler and O. Lassila (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), pp. 34--43.
 
3
Casati, R., Smith, B., and A. C. Varzi (1998). Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation. In Guarino, N. (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 77--85.
 
4
Fonseca, F., Camara, G. and A. Monteiro (2006). A Framework to Measure The Interoperability of Geo-ontologies. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(4), 307--29
 
5
Fu, G., Jones, C. B., and A. Abdelmoty (2005). Building a Geographical Ontology for Intelligent Spatial Search on the Web. Databases and Applications, pp. 167--172.
 
6
Gatrell, J. D., Bierly, G. D. and J. J. Jensen (2005). Research Design and Proposal Writing in Spatial Science. Springer.
 
7
Hill, L. L., Frew J., and Q. Zheng (1999). Geographic Names: The Implementation of a Gazetteer in a Georeferenced Digital Library. D-Lib Magazine 5(1).
 
8
Hyvönen, E., Lindroos, R., T. Kauppinen and R. Henriksson (2007). An Ontology Service for Geographical Content. ISCW 2007 + ASCW 2007, 11--15 November, Busan, Korea.
 
9
10
 
11
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (2008). GEONet Names Server (GNS).
 
12
OGC (2005). Simple Feature Access - Part 1. Common Architeture. Version 1.0.0, OpenGIS® Implementation Specification, OpenGIS Project Document: OGC 05-126
 
13
Paasi, A. (2002). Place and region: regional words and words. Progress in Human Geography 26(6), pp. 802--811.
 
14
Pattison, W. D. (1964). Four Traditions of Geography. Journal of Geography 63 (5), pp. 211--216.
 
15
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placeness. London, UK: Pilon.
 
16
Salter, C. L, and J. J. Hobbs (2000). Essentials of World Regional Geography. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson.
 
17
Tuan, Y. (1975). Place: An Experiential Perspective. Geographical Review 65, pp. 151--165.
 
18
Ushold M. and M. Gruninger (1996). Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Riikka Henriksson: colleagues
Tomi Kauppinen: colleagues
Eero Hyvönen: colleagues