ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An initial investigation on evaluating semantic web instance data
Full text PdfPdf (164 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Beijing, China
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 1179-1180  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-085-2
Authors
Li Ding  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
Jiao Tao  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
Deborah L. McGuinness  Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367715
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many emerging semantic web applications include ontologies from one set of authors and instance data from another (often much larger) set of authors. Often ontologies are reused and instance data is integrated in manners unanticipated by their authors. Not surprisingly, many instance data rich applications encounter instance data that is not compatible with the expectations of the original ontology author(s). This line of work focuses on issues related to semantic expectation mismatches in instance data. Our initial results include a customizable and extensible service-oriented evaluation architecture, and a domain implementation called PmlValidator, which checks instance data using the corresponding ontologies and additional style requirements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Baclawski, C. J. Matheus, M. M. Kokar1, J. Letkowski, and P. A. Kogut. Towards a symptom ontology for semantic web applications. In ISWC, pages 650--667, 2004.
 
2
L. Ding and T. Finin. Characterizing the semantic web on the web. In ISWC, pages 242--257, 2006.
 
3
A. Gangemi, C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita, and J. Lehmann. Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In ESWC, pages 140--154, 2006.
 
4
A. Gómez-Pérez. Evaluation of ontologies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 16(3):391--409, 2001.
 
5
D. L. McGuinness and P. P. da Silva. Explaining answers from the semantic web: the inference web approach. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(4):397--413, 2004.
 
6
D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In KR, pages 483--493, 2000.
7
 
8
 
9
P. Plessers and O. D. Troyer. Resolving inconsistencies in evolving ontologies. In ESWC, pages 200--214, 2006.
 
10
H. Wang, M. Horridge, A. Rector, N. Drummond, and J. Seidenberg. Debugging owl-dl ontologies: A heuristic approach. In ISWC, pages 745--757, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Li Ding: colleagues
Jiao Tao: colleagues
Deborah L. McGuinness: colleagues