ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network
Full text PdfPdf (1.44 MB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Industrial track session table of contents
Pages 915-924  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-085-2
Authors
Jure Leskovec  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Eric Horvitz  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 166,   Citation Count: 11
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367620
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a study of anonymized data capturing a month of high-level communication activities within the whole of the Microsoft Messenger instant-messaging system. We examine characteristics and patterns that emerge from the collective dynamics of large numbers of people, rather than the actions and characteristics of individuals. The dataset contains summary properties of 30 billion conversations among 240 million people. From the data, we construct a communication graph with 180 million nodes and 1.3 billion undirected edges, creating the largest social network constructed and analyzed to date. We report on multiple aspects of the dataset and synthesized graph. We find that the graph is well-connected and robust to node removal. We investigate on a planetary-scale the oft-cited report that people are separated by "six degrees of separation" and find that the average path length among Messenger users is 6.6. We find that people tend to communicate more with each other when they have similar age, language, and location, and that cross-gender conversations are both more frequent and of longer duration than conversations with the same gender.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406:378, 2000.
 
2
J. I. Alvarez-Hamelin, L. Dall'Asta, A. Barrat, and A. Vespignani. Analysis and visualization of large scale networks using the k-core decomposition. In ECCS '05: European Conference on Complex Systems, 2005.
3
 
4
A.-L. Barabasi. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature, 435:207, 2005.
 
5
V. Batagelj and M. Zaversnik. Generalized cores. ArXiv, (cs.DS/0202039), Feb 2002.
 
6
IDC Market Analysis. Worldwide Enterprise Instant Messaging Applications 2005--2009 Forecast and 2004 Vendor Shares: Clearing the Decks for Substantial Growth. 2005.
 
7
J. Leskovec and E. Horvitz. Worldwide Buzz: Planetary-Scale Views on an Instant-Messaging Network. Tech. report MSR-TR-2006-186, 2006.
 
8
P. V. Marsden. Core discussion networks of americans. American Sociological Review, 52(1):122--131, 1987.
 
9
M. McPherson, L. Smith-Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1):415--444, 2001.
10
 
11
E. Ravasz and A.-L. Barabasi. Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Physical Review E, 67(2):026112, 2003.
 
12
E. M. Rogers and D. K. Bhowmik. Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34:523--538, 1970.
 
13
X. Shi, L. A. Adamic, and M. J. Strauss. Networks of strong ties. Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 378:33--47, May 2007.
14
 
15
M. P. Stumpf, C. Wiuf, R. M. May. Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: sampling properties of networks. PNAS, 102(12), 2005.
 
16
S. L. Tauro, C. Palmer, G. Siganos, and M. Faloutsos. A simple conceptual model for the internet topology. In GLOBECOM '01, vol. 3, pages 1667--1671, 2001.
 
17
J. Travers and S. Milgram. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 1969.
18
 
19
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393:440--442, 1998.
 
20

CITED BY  11

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jure Leskovec: colleagues
Eric Horvitz: colleagues