ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A graph-theoretic approach to webpage segmentation
Full text PdfPdf (489 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Search: corpus characterization and Search Perform table of contents
Pages 377-386  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-085-2
Authors
Deepayan Chakrabarti  Yahoo! Research, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Ravi Kumar  Yahoo! Research, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Kunal Punera  Yahoo! Research, Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 146,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367549
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of segmenting a webpage into visually and semantically cohesive pieces. Our approach is based on formulating an appropriate optimization problem on weighted graphs, where the weights capture if two nodes in the DOM tree should be placed together or apart in the segmentation; we present a learning framework to learn these weights from manually labeled data in a principled manner. Our work is a significant departure from previous heuristic and rule-based solutions to the segmentation problem. The results of our empirical analysis bring out interesting aspects of our framework, including variants of the optimization problem and the role of learning.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
D. Cai, S. Yu, J.-R. Wen, and W.-Y. Ma. Extracting content structure for web pages based on visual representation. In 5th Asia Pacific Web Conference, pages 406--415, 2003.
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
L. Hubert and P. Arabie. Comparing partitions. J. Classification, 2:193--218, 1985.
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
G. Milligan and M. Cooper. A study of the comparability of external criteria for hierarchical cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21(4):441--458, 1986.
 
17
 
18
 
19
K. Weinberger, J. Blitzer, and L. Saul. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. In NIPS 2006, pages 1473--1480, 2006.
20


Collaborative Colleagues:
Deepayan Chakrabarti: colleagues
Ravi Kumar: colleagues
Kunal Punera: colleagues