ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Optimal marketing strategies over social networks
Full text PdfPdf (243 KB)
Source
International World Wide Web Conference archive
Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Internet monetization: recommendation and security table of contents
Pages 189-198  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-085-2
Authors
Jason Hartline  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Vahab Mirrokni  Microsoft Resarch, Redmond, WA, USA
Mukund Sundararajan  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 59,   Downloads (12 Months): 374,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1367497.1367524
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We discuss the use of social networks in implementing viral marketing strategies. While influence maximization has been studied in this context (see Chapter 24 of [10]), we study revenue maximization, arguably, a more natural objective. In our model, a buyer's decision to buy an item is influenced by the set of other buyers that own the item and the price at which the item is offered.

We focus on algorithmic question of finding revenue maximizing marketing strategies. When the buyers are completely symmetric, we can find the optimal marketing strategy in polynomial time. In the general case, motivated by hardness results, we investigate approximation algorithms for this problem. We identify a family of strategies called influence-and-exploit strategies that are based on the following idea: Initially influence the population by giving the item for free to carefully a chosen set of buyers. Then extract revenue from the remaining buyers using a 'greedy' pricing strategy. We first argue why such strategies are reasonable and then show how to use recently developed set-function maximization techniques to find the right set of buyers to influence.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Barlow, Richard E. and Marshall, Albert W. Bounds for distributions with monotone hazard rate, i. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(3):1234--1257, sep 1964.
 
3
Barlow, Richard E. and Marshall, Albert W. Bounds for distributions with monotone hazard rate, ii. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(3):1258--1274, sep 1964.
 
4
 
5
Luis Cabral, David Salant, and Glenn Woroch. Monopoly pricing with network externalities. Industrial Organization 9411003, EconWPA, November 1994.
6
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
J. Kleinberg. Cascading behavior in networks: algorithmic and economic issues. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
 
11
Jay Meattle. http://blog.compete.com/2007/01/25/top-20-websites-ranked-by-time-spent/.
 
12
R. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):58--73, 1981.
 
13
G. Nemhauser, L. Wolsey, and M. Fisher. An analysis of the approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. Mathematical Programming, 14:265--294, 1978.
 
14
 
15
Ed Oswald. http://www.betanews.com/article/Google_Buy_MySpace_Ads_for_900m/1155050350.
 
16
Everett Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Free Press, August 2003.
 
17
Pekka Sääskilahti. Monopoly pricing of social goods. MPRA Paper 3526, University Library of Munich, Germany, 2007.
 
18
Katharine Q. Seeyle.
 
19
Rob Walker. http://www.slate.com/id/1006264/.
 
20
Tim Weber. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6305957.stm?lsf.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jason Hartline: colleagues
Vahab Mirrokni: colleagues
Mukund Sundararajan: colleagues