ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Energy efficiency bounds of pulse-encoded buses
Full text PdfPdf (405 KB)
Source
Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI archive
Proceedings of the 18th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI table of contents
Orlando, Florida, USA
SESSION: Session 3A: Low Power Circuits table of contents
Pages 183-188  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-999-9
Authors
Karthik Duraisami  Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Enrico Macii  Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Massimo Poncino  Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1366110.1366156
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Pulse-encoded buses, (i.e., in which a transition is encoded as a pulse) have recently emerged as an effective solution to solve crosstalk issues in global interconnects, since they suppress transitions in opposite directions by construction. As a side effect, this also reduces energy, since coupling capacitances in deep-submicron technologies are larger than ground capacitances. Furthermore, a single pulse consumes less energy than a conventional transition, because the limited length does not fully implies extra transitions since all input transitions are encoded with a pulse.

This tradeoff leaves the issue of energy efficiency of pulsed buses an open problem, which we address in this work. We present an explorative analysis of the energy efficiency bounds of pulse encoded bus with respect to conventional level-signaled ones. More specifically, we provide a quantitative comparison of the two signaling modes under the same delay constraints, by accounting for the various bus devices (codecs, drivers, and receivers), under (i) the presence of process variations, and (ii) under different input switching activities transmitted on a bus, along with the impact of delay and pulse width.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
Application-Specific Systems", 38th DAC, pp. 750--753, 2001.
 
12
C.-G. Lyuh, T. Kim, "Low power bus encoding with crosstalk delay elimination", IEE Computers and Digital Techniques, Vol. 153, No. 2, 2006.
 
13
S. Salerno, E. Macii, M. Poncino "Crosstalk energy reduction by temporal shielding," ISCAS-04, pp. 749--752, 2004.
 
14
M. Khellah, J. Tschanz, Y. Ye, S. Narendra, V. De, "Static pulsed bus for on-chip interconnects," VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 78--79, 2002.
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
T. Sakurai, "Superconnect Technology," IEICE Trans. On Electron., vol. E84-C, no. 12, 2001.
 
19
 
20
M.R. Stan, W.P. Burleson, "Limited-Weight Codes for Low Power I/O," IWLPD-94, 1994.
 
21
J.W. Tschanz et al., "CMOS Bus Pulsing," US Patent: US 20020158668A1

Collaborative Colleagues:
Karthik Duraisami: colleagues
Enrico Macii: colleagues
Massimo Poncino: colleagues