ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A system for modal and deontic defeasible reasoning
Full text PdfPdf (243 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: The semantic web and applications table of contents
Pages 2261-2265  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
Authors
Grigoris Antoniou  Institute of Computer Science, Heraklion, Greece
Nikos Dimaresis  Institute of Computer Science, Heraklion, Greece
Guido Governatori  The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 29,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1364226
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Defeasible reasoning is a well-established nonmonotonic reasoning approach that has recently been combined with semantic web technologies. This paper describes modal and deontic extensions of defeasible logic, and shows how these extensions can bbe used for modelling multi-agent systems and policies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
N. Bassiliades, G. Antoniou, and I. P. Vlahavas. DR-DEVICE: A Defeasible Logic System for the Semantic Web. In PPSWR, pages 134--148, 2004.
 
6
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5):34--44, May 2001.
 
7
M. E. Bratman, D. Israel, and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349--355, 1988.
8
 
9
T. Eiter, G. Ianni, R. Schindlauer, and H. Tompits. dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework. In WLP, pages 206--210, 2006.
 
10
 
11
G. Governatori. Representing business contracts in RuleML. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst., 14(2--3):181--216, 2005.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
G. Governatori and A. Rotolo. Defeasible Logic: Agency, Intention and Obligation. In DEON, pages 114--128, 2004.
16
 
17
B. N. Grosof. Representing E-Commerce Rules via Situated Courteous Logic Programs in RuleML. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3(1):2--20, 2004.
18
19
20
 
21
InterProlog - a Prolog-Java interface. http://www.declarativa.com/interprolog, 2007.
 
22
M. J. Maher. A Model-Theoretic Semantics for Defeasible Logic. In Paraconsistent Computational Logic, pages 67--80, 2002.
 
23
M. J. Maher, A. Rock, G. Antoniou, D. Billington, and T. Miller. Efficient defeasible reasoning systems. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 10(4):483--501, 2001.
 
24
 
25
A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewall, editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR '91), pages 473--484. Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc.: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1991.
 
26
R. Rosati. On the decidability and complexity of integrating ontologies and rules. WSJ, 3(1):41--60, 2005.
 
27
SWI-Prolog. http://www.swi-prolog.org, 2007.
 
28
XSB - Logic Programming and Deductive Database System for Unix and Windows. http://xsb.sourceforge.net, 2007.
 
29
YAP Prolog. http://www.ncc.up.pt/vsc/Yap, 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Grigoris Antoniou: colleagues
Nikos Dimaresis: colleagues
Guido Governatori: colleagues