|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
In recent years role-based access control (RBAC) has been spreading within organizations. However, companies still have considerable difficulty migrating to this model, due to the complexity involved in identifying a set of roles fitting the real needs of the company. All the various role engineering methods proposed thus far lack a metric for measuring the "quality" of candidate roles produced. This paper proposes a new approach guided by a cost-based metric, where "cost" represents the effort to administer the resulting RBAC. Further, we propose REAM (Role-Based Association-rule Mining), an algorithm leveraging the cost metric to find candidate role-sets with the lowest possible administration cost. For a specific parameter set, RBAM behaves as already existing role mining algorithms and is, worst case, NP-complete. Yet, we will provide several examples showing the sensibility of assumptions made by the algorithm. Further, application of the algorithm to real data will highlight the improvements over current solutions. Finally, we comment on the direction of future research. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||