ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A method for semantics-based conceptual expansion of ontology
Full text PdfPdf (127 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: Natural language processing and speech recognition table of contents
Pages 1583-1587  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
Authors
Liping Zhou  University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China
Dezheng Zhang  University of Science and Technology, Beijing, China
Xin Chen  University of Alabama at Birmingham
Chengcui Zhang  University of Alabama at Birmingham
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 82,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1364057
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For the past few years, automatic Ontology construction and expansion is one of the most important research subjects in the field of knowledge engineering. Compared with the traditional Term Frequency method, we propose a semantics-based method to extract concepts from a large corpus of text documents and expand the concepts of the known Ontology based on the semantic relations between two terms. The proposed method explores how to identify the candidate concepts, and how to give suggestions to knowledge engineers on where the concepts should be inserted in a given Ontology. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated by experiments on a Traditional Chinese Medicine text corpus.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Faatz, A., Hoermann, S., Seeberg, C., Steinmetz, R. 2001. Conceptual Enrichment of Ontologies by Means of a Generic and Configurable Approach. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Knowledge Acquisition and Categorization (Helsinki, Finland, August 2001).
 
3
Resnik, P. 1999. Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: an Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11.
 
4
The Universal Networking Language (UNL) Specifications Version 3 Edition 3 http://www.undl.org/imlsys/iml/UNLSpecs33.pdf
 
5
Choudhary, B. and Bhattacharyya P. 2002. Text clustering using semantics. In Proceedings of the eleventh International World Wide Web Conference.
 
6
Li, Y., Bandar, Z. A., and McLean, D. 2003. An Approach for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15, 4 (July 2003).
 
7
Spark-Jones, K. 1997. Readings in Information Retrieval, Morgan Kaufmann.
 
8
Bisson, G., Nedellec, C., and Cañamero, L. 2000. Designing Clustering Methods for Ontology Building - The o'K workbench. In Proceedings of the Ontology Learning ECAl-2000 Workshop (August 2000).
 
9
Ampl Optimization Software: http://www.ampl.com
 
10
Borst, W. N. 1997. Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Liping Zhou: colleagues
Dezheng Zhang: colleagues
Xin Chen: colleagues
Chengcui Zhang: colleagues