| Towards a complete SCM ontology: the case of ontologising RosettaNet |
| Full text |
Pdf
(283 KB)
|
| Source
|
Symposium on Applied Computing
archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing
table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: e-business applications
table of contents
Pages 1467-1473
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11, Downloads (12 Months): 80, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a methodology to derive a Supply Chain Management Ontology based on the RosettaNet specification framework. A prototype to mechanically derive a core ontology spanning all new Partner Interface Processes in the RosettaNet framework is developed and its algorithms to reconcile the ontology structure and to generate a proper subsumption hierarchy are presented. We further present how we designed and referenced outer layer ontologies we analysed to be required to resolve the remaining disparities in the core ontology. The resulting ontology framework enables to more easily deal with different message structures in dynamic Business-to-Business collaborations and thus ensures a better interoperability for the partners involved.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
N. Anicic, N. Ivezic, and A. Jones. An Architecture for Semantic Enterprise Application Integration Standards, pp. 25--34. Interoperability of Enterprise Software and Applications. Springer, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5):34--43, 2001.
|
| |
3
|
J. Bosak, T. McGrath, and G. K. Holman. Universal business language v2.0, Dec. 2006.
|
| |
4
|
D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
|
| |
5
|
J. de Bruijn, et al. The Web Service Modeling Language WSML. WSML Final Draft D16.1v0.2, DERI, Oct. 2005. Available from: http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.21/.
|
| |
6
|
J. de Bruijn, et al. Web Service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). Member submission, W3C, 2005. Available from: http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSMO/.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
S. Damodaran. RosettaNet: Adoption Brings New Problems, New Solutions. In Proceedings of the XML 2005 Conference, pp. 1--14. Atlanta, USA, 2005.
|
| |
9
|
D. Foxvog and C. Bussler. Ontologizing EDI Semantics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologising Industrial Standards, pp. 301--311. Springer, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2006.
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
M. Hepp. A methodology for deriving OWL ontologies from products and services categorization standards. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2005), pp. 1--12. 2005b.
|
| |
13
|
G. Klyne and J. J. Carroll. Resource description framework (RDF): Concepts and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, and I. Horrocks. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
M. Stollberg, et al. Wsmo use case "virtual travel agency". WSMO Working Draft D3.3 v0.1, DERI, 2004. http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d3/d3.3/v0.1/.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
|