ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
HIV drug resistance analysis tool based on process algebra
Full text PdfPdf (383 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: Computer applications in health care table of contents
Pages: 1358-1363  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
Authors
Luciano Vieira de Araújo  University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão
Ester C. Sabino  University of São Paulo, Brazil
João Eduardo Ferreira  University of São Paulo, Rua do Matão
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1364001
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The increasing number of drugs used in HIV patient treatment and the mutations associated with drug resistance make the inference of drug resistance a complex task that demands computational systems. Furthermore, the software development/update can generate an extra level of complexity in the process drug resistance analysis. An alternative to handle the complexity of drug resistance and software development is to use a formal representation of involved processes, such as process algebra. This allows mathematical reasoning about the analysis process, a precise description of system behavior, more advanced computational approaches, as concurrent/parallel execution and (semi) automatic software development. The first contribution of this research is a mapping of drug resistance algorithms rules into expressions of process algebra which facilitates the computational manipulation of theses rules. The second contribution is the HIVdag (HIV Drug Analysis Generator) system. This software supports the definition, generation and analyses of genotypic drug resistance tests based on process algebra expressions. Therefore, the users can easily create/update their own drug resistance algorithms any time and independent of software development.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Araújo, L. V.; Soares, M. A.; Tanuri, A.; Oliveira, S. M.; Chequer, P.; Sabino, E. C.; Ferreira, J. E., DBCollHIV: A Database System for Collaborative HIV analysis in Brazil. Genetics and molecular research, v.5, p.203--215, 2006.
 
2
Barreto, C. C., Nishyia, A., Araujo, L. V., Ferreira, J. E., Busch, M. P. and Sabino, E. C., Trends in antiretroviral drug resistance and clade distributions among HIV-1-infected blood donors in Sao Paulo, Brazil, J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 41(2006)338--41.
3
 
4
Betts, B. J., and R. W. Shafer. Algorithm specification interface for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotypic interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:2792--2794. 2003.
 
5
 
6
Liu TF, Shafer RW(2006). Web Resources for HIV type 1 Genotypic-Resistance Test Interpretation. Clin Infect Dis 42(11):1608--18. Epub 2006.
 
7
Meynard, J. L., M. Vray, L. Morand-Joubert, et al. Phenotypic or genotypic resistance testing for choosing antiretroviral therapy after treatment failure: a randomized trial. AIDS 16:727--736.2002.
 
8
Ravela J, Betts BJ, Brun-Vezinet F, et al. HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase mutation patterns responsible for discordances between genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;33:8--14.
 
9
Shafer RW, Stevenson D, Chan B. Human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and protease sequence database. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:348--352.
 
10
Shafer RW. Rationale and Uses of a Public HIV Drug-Resistance Database. Journal of Infectious Diseases 194 Suppl 1:851--8.2006.
 
11
Snoeck, Joke; Kantor, Rami; Shafer, Robert W; et al. Discordances between interpretation algorithms for genotypic resistance to protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus are subtype dependent. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, v.50, n.2, p.694--701, 2006.
 
12
Van Laethem, K., A. De Luca, A. Antinori, A. Cingolani, C. F. Perno, and A.-M. Vandamme. 2002. A genotypic drug resistance algorithm that significantly predicts therapy response in HIV-1 infected patients. Antivir. Ther. 7:123--129.
 
13
Zazzi, M.; Romano, L.; Venturi, G.; Shafer, R.; Reid, C.; Dal Bello, F.; Parolin, C; Palù, G.; Valensin, P; Comparative evaluation of three computerized algorithms for prediction of antiretroviral susceptibility from HIV type 1 genotype. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (2004) 53, 356--360 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh021

Collaborative Colleagues:
Luciano Vieira de Araújo: colleagues
Ester C. Sabino: colleagues
João Eduardo Ferreira: colleagues