Proposing metrics of difficulty of domain knowledge using usecase diagrams

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Proposing metrics of difficulty of domain knowledge using usecase diagrams

Full text

Pdf (129 KB)

Source

Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents

Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

SESSION: Requirements engineering table of contents

Pages 624-629

Year of Publication: 2008

ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7

Authors

Akira Osada	Shinshu University, Nagano
Daigo Ozawa	Shinshu University, Nagano
Naoyuki Kitazawa	Shinshu University, Nagano
Haruhiko Kaiya	Shinshu University, Nagano
Kenji Kaijiri	Shinshu University, Nagano

Sponsor

SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 3, Downloads (12 Months): 39, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1363837 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In a system development, the knowledge of a target business is very important factor for the success of a development. The needed part of such knowledge is different for each stakeholder. Therefore, we need a method to measure the level of understanding of a stakeholder and a method to categorize business knowledge. This paper proposes the metric of difficulty level in order to measure the business knowledge. Moreover, we performed the experiment to confirm the suitability of the proposed metric.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/istar/.
	2	Alistair Cockburn, Writing Effective Use Cases, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2000
	3	Geri Schneider , Jason P. Winters, Applying use cases (2nd ed.): a practical guide, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 2001
	4	B. Henderson-Sellers , M. K. Serour , C. Gonzalez-Perez , A. Qumer, Improving agile software development by the application of method engineering practices, Proceedings of the 25th conference on IASTED International Multi-Conference: Software Engineering, p.55-60, February 13-15, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria
	5	Junzo Kato , Morio Nagata , Shuichiro Yamamoto , Motoshi Saeki , Haruhiko Kaiya , Hisayuki Horai , Atsushi Ohnishi , Seiichi Komiya , Kenji Watahiki, PAORE: Package Oriented Requirements Elicitation, Proceedings of the Tenth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Software Engineering Conference, p.17, December 10-12, 2003
	6	B. Martin and A. Mitrovic. Using learning curves to mine student models. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on User Modeling, pages 79--88, 2005.
	7	J. Smith. The estimation of effort based on use cases, 1999. Rational Software white paper.