ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A validation methodology for agent-based simulations
Full text PdfPdf (140 KB)
Source Symposium on Applied Computing archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing table of contents
Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
SESSION: Advances in computer simulation table of contents
Pages 39-43  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-753-7
Author
Franziska Klügl  University of Würzburg, Würzburg
Sponsor
SIGAPP: ACM Special Interest Group on Applied Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1363686.1363696
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Validity forms the basic prerequisite for every simulation model, therefore also for reasonable usage of the agent-based simulation paradigm. However, models based on the multi-agent system metaphor tend to need some particular approaches. In this paper, I propose a process for validating agent-based simulation models that combines face validation, sensitivity analysis, calibration and statistical validation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Axtell, R. Axelrod, J. E. Cohen, and M. D. Cohen. Aligning simulation models - a case study and results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1:123--141, 1996.
 
2
O. Balci. Validation, verification and testing techniques troughout the life cycle of a simulation study. Annals of Operations Research, 53:121--173, 1994.
 
3
O. Barreteau et al. Our companion modeling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(2), 2003.
 
4
K. Carley. Validating computational models. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
 
5
J. Doran and M. Palmer. The eos project: Integrating two models of palaeolithic social change. In N. Gilbert and R. Conte, editors, Artificial Societies - The Computer Simulation of Social Life, chapter 6, pages 103--125. UCL, 1995.
 
6
 
7
M. Fehler, F. Klügl, and F. Puppe. Learning for analysis and calibration in agent-based simulation. In Proc. of the ALAMAS 2006, Bruessels, 2006.
 
8
P. Guyot and S. Honiden. Agent-based participatory simulations: Merging multi-agent systems and role-playing games. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(4), 2006.
 
9
L. R. Izquierdo and J. G. Polhill. Is your model susceptible to floating-point errors? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(4):4, 2006.
 
10
 
11
 
12
R. Leombruni, M. Richiardi, N. J. Saam, and M. Sonnessa. A common protocol for agent-based social simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1), 2006.
 
13
S. Moss, T. E. Downing, and J. Rouchier. Demonstrating the role of stakeholder participation: An agent based social simulation model of water demand policy and response. Technical Report CPM Report No.: 00--76, CPM, 2000.
 
14
R. Suleiman, K. G. Troitzsch, and N. Gilbert, editors. Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation. Physica-Verlag, 2000.
 
15
K. G. Troitzsch. Validating simulation models. In Proceedings of the 18th European Simulation Multiconference, SCS Europe, 2004.
 
16