ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Intelligent decision support in medicine: back to Bayes?
Full text PdfPdf (67 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 250 archive
Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore! table of contents
London, United Kingdom
SESSION: Keynote addresses (abstracts) table of contents
Pages 7-8  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-84799-849-1
Author
Gitte Lindgaard  Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Sponsors
: The British Computer Society
: Middlesex University, London, School of Computing Science
: European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
: Interactions, the Human-Computer Interaction Specialist Group of the BCS
SIGCHI : Specialist Interest Group in Computer-Human Interaction of the ACM
: Brunel University, West London, Department of Information Systems and Computing
EACE : European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1362550.1362554
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Decision Support Systems (DSSs) are proliferating at an increasingly rapid pace in many areas of human endeavor including clinical medicine and psychology. These DSSs are typically based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), many of which have been shown to perform very well (e.g. Ennett, 2003). In this talk in which I am specifically concerned with medicine and e-health, I will attempt to show that Bayes' Theorem can offer an alternative and very effective approach to the design of DSSs. Bayesian models are highly adaptive in the sense that they are able to 'learn' iteratively from 'experience' without changing the underlying structure. This important feature enables customization of Bayesian models to individual users and thus to their changing needs. In e-learning contexts as well as in interventional e-health, particularly in clinical psychology, this is an important advantage, especially when courses or treatment plans are offering a range of different routes through, or different possible presentation modes of, the learning material.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Briggs, K., & Myers, I. (1998). Myers-Briggs type indicator, Consulting Psychological Press, INC, Palo Alto, CA.
 
2
 
3
Furnham, A., Jackson, C., & Miller, T. (1999). Personality, learning style and work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1113--1122.
 
4
Hughes, C. M., Phillips, J., Woodcock, J. (2000). How Many Deaths Are Due to Medical Errors?, Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 2187--2189.
 
5
Jackson, C., & Lawty-Jones, M. (1996). Explaining the overlap between personality and learning style. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(3), 293--300.
 
6
Larsen, R., & Buss, D. (2002). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. New York: McGraw Hill.
 
7
Schiff, G. D., Kim, S., Abrams, R., Cosby, K., Lambert, B., Elstein, A. S., Hasler, S., Krosnjar, N., Odwazny, R., Wisniewski, M. A., & McNutt, R. A. (2006). Advances in patient safety, 2, 255--278.