ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the approximability of some network design problems
Full text PdfPdf (175 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 2  (May 2008) table of contents
Article No. 23  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Julia Chuzhoy  Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT and, University of Pennsylvania
Anupam Gupta  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Joseph (Seffi) Naor  Technion, Israel, Haifa, Israel
Amitabh Sinha  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1361192.1361200
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Consider the following classical network design problem: a set of terminals T = {ti} wishes to send traffic to a root r in an n-node graph G = (V, E). Each terminal ti sends di units of traffic and enough bandwidth has to be allocated on the edges to permit this. However, bandwidth on an edge e can only be allocated in integral multiples of some base capacity ue and hence provisioning k × ue bandwidth on edge e incurs a cost of ⌈k⌉ times the cost of that edge. The objective is a minimum-cost feasible solution.

This is one of many network design problems widely studied where the bandwidth allocation is governed by side constraints: edges can only allow a subset of cables to be purchased on them or certain quality-of-service requirements may have to be met.

In this work, we show that this problem and, in fact, several basic problems in this general network design framework cannot be approximated better than Ω(log log n) unless NP ⊆ DTIME (nO(log log log n)), where |V| = n. In particular, we show that this inapproximability threshold holds for (i) the Priority-Steiner Tree problem, (ii) the (single-sink) Cost-Distance problem, and (iii) the single-sink version of an even more fundamental problem, Fixed Charge Network Flow. Our results provide a further breakthrough in the understanding of the level of complexity of network design problems. These are the first nonconstant hardness results known for all these problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Andrews, M., and Zhang, L. 2002. Approximation algorithms for access network design. Algorithmica 34, 2, 197--215.
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Current, J. R., Revelle, C. S., and Cohon, J. L. 1986. The hierarchical network design problem. European J. Oper. Resear. 27, 57--66.
 
10
Duin, C., and Volgenant, T. 1991. The multi-weighted Steiner tree problem. Ann. Oper. Resear. 33, 1-4, 451--469. Topological network design (Copenhagen, 1989).
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
Gunluk, O. 1999. A branch-and-cut algorithm for capacitated network design problems. Math. Program. 86, 17--39.
 
19
20
21
 
22
Jain, K. 2001. A factor 2 approximation algorithm for the generalized Steiner network problem. Combinatorica 21, 1, 39--60.
 
23
 
24
25
 
26
 
27
Maxemchuk, N. F. 1997. Video distribution on multicast networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 15, 357--372.
 
28
29
 
30
 
31
Mirchandani, P. 1996. The multi-tier tree problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 8, 202--218.
 
32
 
33
Ortega, F., and Wolsey, L. A. 2003. A branch-and-cut algorithm for the single-commodity, uncapacitated, fixed-charge network flow problem. Networks 41, 3, 143--158.
 
34
Pirkul, H., Current, J., and Nagarajan, V. 1991. The hierarchical network design problem: a new formulation and solution procedures. Transport. Sci. 25, 175--182.
 
35
 
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
 
41
Turletti, T., and Bolot, J.-C. 1994. Issues with multicast video distribution in heterogeneous packet networks. In Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on Packet Video.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Julia Chuzhoy: colleagues
Anupam Gupta: colleagues
Joseph (Seffi) Naor: colleagues
Amitabh Sinha: colleagues