ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Progressive inter-scale and intra-scale non-blind image deconvolution
Full text MovMov (26:21),  PdfPdf (13.93 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 27 ,  Issue 3  (August 2008) table of contents
Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2008
SESSION: Deblurring & dehazing table of contents
Article No. 74  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Lu Yuan  The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Jian Sun  Microsoft Research Asia
Long Quan  The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Heung-Yeung Shum  Microsoft Research Asia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 57,   Downloads (12 Months): 456,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1360612.1360673
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Ringing is the most disturbing artifact in the image deconvolution. In this paper, we present a progressive inter-scale and intra-scale non-blind image deconvolution approach that significantly reduces ringing. Our approach is built on a novel edge-preserving deconvolution algorithm called bilateral Richardson-Lucy (BRL) which uses a large spatial support to handle large blur. We progressively recover the image from a coarse scale to a fine scale (inter-scale), and progressively restore image details within every scale (intra-scale). To perform the inter-scale deconvolution, we propose a joint bilateral Richardson-Lucy (JBRL) algorithm so that the recovered image in one scale can guide the deconvolution in the next scale. In each scale, we propose an iterative residual deconvolution to progressively recover image details. The experimental results show that our progressive deconvolution can produce images with very little ringing for large blur kernels.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Agrawal, A., and Raskar, R. 2007. Resolving objects at higher resolution from a single motion-blurred image. In Proceedings of CVPR, 1--8.
 
2
Banham, M. R., and Katsaggelos, A. K. 1997. Digital image restoration. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 42, 2, 24--41.
 
3
Bar, L., Sochen, N., and Kiryati, N. 2006. Semi-blind image restoration via mumford-shah regularization. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing. 15, 2, 483--493.
 
4
Bardsley, J., Jefferies, S., Nagy, J., and Plemmons, R. 2006. Blind iterative restoration of images with spatially-varying blur. In Optics Express, 1767--1782.
 
5
Ben-Ezra, M., and Nayar, S. K. 2003. Motion deblurring using hybrid imaging. In Proceedings of CVPR, vol. I, 657--664.
 
6
Black, M. J., Sapiro, G., Marimont, D. H., and Heeger, D. 1998. Robust anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 7, 3, 421--432.
 
7
Caron, J. N., M., N. N., and J., R. C. 2002. Noniterative blind data restoration by use of an extracted filter function. Applied optics (Appl. opt.) 41, 32, 68--84.
 
8
Dey, N., Blanc-Fraud, L., Zimmer, C., Kam, Z., Roux, P., Olivo-Marin, J., and Zerubia., J. 2006. Richardson-lucy algorithm with total variation regularization for 3d confocal microscope deconvolution. Microscopy Research Technique 26, 69, 260--266.
 
9
Dowski, E. R., and Johnson, G. E. 1999. Wavefront coding: A modern method of achieving high performance and/or low cost imaging systems. In SPIE, vol. 29, 137--145.
10
11
12
 
13
Figueiredo, M., Bioucas-Dias, J., and Nowak, R. 2007. Majorization-minimization algorithms for wavelet-based image restoration. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 16, 12, 2980--2991.
 
14
 
15
Geman, D., and Yang, C. 1995. Nonlinear image recovery with half-quadratic regularization. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 4, 7, 932--946.
16
 
17
Invensense.com. http://www.invensense.com/.
 
18
Jia, J. 2007. Single image motion deblurring using transparency. In Proceedings of CVPR, 1141--1151.
19
 
20
Kundur, D., and Hatzinakos, D. 1996. Blind image deconvolution. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 13, 3, 43--64.
21
 
22
Levin, A. 2006. Blind motion deblurring using image statistics. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, 841--848.
23
 
24
Lucy, L. 1974. An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astronomical Journal 79, 745.
 
25
Mignotte, M. 2006. A segmentation-based regularization term for image deconvolution. IEEE Trans on Image Processing 15, 7, 1973--1984.
 
26
Murtagh, F., Starck, J. L., and Bijaoui., A. 1995. Image restoration with noise suppression using a multiresolution support. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 112, 179--189.
 
27
Neelamani, R., Choi, H., and Baraniuk, R. 2004. ForWaRd: Fourier-wavelet regularized deconvolution for ill-conditioned systems. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing 52, 2, 418--433.
28
29
 
30
Reeves, S. J., and Mersereau, R. M. 1992. Blur identification by the method of generalized cross-validation. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing. 1, 3, 301--311.
 
31
 
32
 
33
Tikhonov, A. 1943. On the stability of inverse problems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 39, 5, 195--198.
 
34
35
36
 
37
Zand, J. 1996. Coded aperture imaging in high energy astronomy. NASA Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics (LHEA) at NASA's GSFC.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Lu Yuan: colleagues
Jian Sun: colleagues
Long Quan: colleagues
Heung-Yeung Shum: colleagues