ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A latent semantic analysis methodology for the identification and creation of personas
Full text PdfPdf (330 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Character Development table of contents
Pages 1501-1510  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Tomasz Miaskiewicz  University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Tamara Sumner  University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Kenneth A. Kozar  University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 263,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357290
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A persona represents a group of target users that share common behavioral characteristics. By using a narrative, picture, and name, a persona provides HCI practitioners with a vivid and specific design target. This research develops a new methodology for the identification and creation of personas through the application of Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). An application of the LSA methodology is provided in the context of the design of an Institutional Repository system. The LSA methodology helps overcome some of the drawbacks of current methods for the identification and creation of personas, and makes the process less subjective, more efficient, and less reliant on specialized skills.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Britt, M.A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Larson, A.A. and Perfetti, C. Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students' essays. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 3-4, 2004, 359--374.
3
 
4
 
5
Cooper, A. and Reimann, R.M. About Face 2.0. Wiley Publishing, Indianapolis, IN, 2003.
 
6
Dong, A. The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies, 26, 5, 2005, 445--461.
 
7
Goodwin, K. Getting from research to personas: harnessing the power of data. Cooper Newsletters, 2002, http://www.cooper.com/content/insights/newsletters/2002_11/getting_from_research_to_personas.asp
 
8
Grudin, J. and Pruitt, J. Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. Proc. of the Participatory Design Conference, CPSR (2002), 144--161.
 
9
 
10
Hanna, P. Customer storytelling at the heart of business success. Boxes and Arrows, 2005, http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/customer_storytelling_at_the_heart_of_business_success
 
11
Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 2, 1997, 211--240.
 
12
Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W. and Laham, D. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 2-3, 1998, 259--284.
 
13
Landauer, T.K., McNamara, D.S., Dennis, S.J. and Kintsch W. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2007.
 
14
Landauer, T.K. and Psotka, J. Simulating text understanding for educational applications with latent semantic analysis: introduction to LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 2, 2000, 73--86.
 
15
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 1, 1977, 159--174.
 
16
Lemaire, B. and Dessus, P. A system to assess the semantic content of student essays. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 3, 2001, 305--320.
 
17
Magliano, J.P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Millis, K.K., Munoz, B.D. and McNamara, D. Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 34, 2, 2002, 181--188
 
18
Manning, H., Temkin, B. and Belanger, N. The power of design personas. Forrester Research, 2003, http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,33033,00.html
 
19
Manning, H., Root, N.L. and Backer, E. Site design personas: how many, how much. Forrester Research, 2005, http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,37110,00.html
 
20
Moss, J., Kotovsky, K. and Cagan, J. The role of functionality in the mental representations of engineering students: some differences in the early stages of expertise. Cognitive Science, 30, 1, 2006, 65--93.
 
21
Norman, D. Ad-hoc personas and empathetic focus. Jnd.org, 2004, http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/personas_empath.html
 
22
 
23
Reilly, C., Wang, C. and Rutherford, M. A rapid method for the comparison of cluster analyses. Statistica Sinica, 15, 2005, 19--33
24
 
25
Srihari, S., Collins, J., Srihari, R., Babu, P. and Srinivasan, H. Automated scoring of handwritten essays based on Latent Semantic Analysis. Proc. of Document Analysis Systems, Springer (2006), 71--83.
 
26
 
27

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tomasz Miaskiewicz: colleagues
Tamara Sumner: colleagues
Kenneth A. Kozar: colleagues