ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Blindsight: eyes-free access to mobile phones
Full text PdfPdf (1.07 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Model Interaction table of contents
Pages 1389-1398  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Kevin A. Li  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Patrick Baudisch  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Ken Hinckley  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 259,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357273
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many mobile phones integrate services such as personal calendars. Given the social nature of the stored data, however, users often need to access such information as part of a phone conversation. In typical non-headset use, this re-quires users to interrupt their conversations to look at the screen.

We investigate a counter-intuitive solution: to avoid the need for interruption we replace the visual interface with one based on auditory feedback. Surprisingly, this can be done without interfering with the phone conversation. We present blindSight, a prototype application that replaces the traditionally visual in-call menu of a mobile phone. Users interact using the phone keypad, without looking at the screen. BlindSight responds with auditory feedback. This feedback is heard only by the user, not by the person on the other end of the line.

We present the results of two user studies of our prototype. The first study verifies that useful keypress accuracy can be obtained for the phone-at-ear position. The second study compares the blindSight system against a visual baseline condition and finds a preference for blindSight.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
microsoft.com/windowsmobile/voicecommand/default.mspx
 
2
www.tellme.com.
3
4
 
5
Blanchard, H.E. and Lewis, S.H. (1999). Voice messaging user interface. In D. Gardner-Bonneau (Ed.), Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems, Kluwer, pp. 257--284.
6
7
8
9
 
10
11
 
12
Hansen, J.H.L., Plucienkowski, J., Gallant, S., Pellom, B.L., Ward, B. CU-Move: Robust Speech Processing for In-Vehicle Speech Systems. Proc. ICSLP'00, pp. 524--527.
 
13
Hiraoka, S., Miyamoto, I., Tomimatsu, K. (2003) Behind Touch, a Text Input Method for Mobile Phones by The Back and Tactile Sense Interface. Information Processing Society of Japan, Interaction'03. p. 131--138.
 
14
Hornstein, T. 1994. Telephone voice interfaces on the cheap. UBILAB Rep, Union Bank of Switzerland, Zurich.
15
 
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
Marics, M., and Engelbeck, G. (1997). Designing voice menu applications for telephones, in Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Helander, M., Landauer, T., and Prabhu, P. Edi-tors. Elsevier, pp. 1085--1102.
22
23
 
24
Rosenberger, J., and Gasco, M. (1983). Comparing location estimators: Trimmed means, medians, and trimean. in Under-standing robust and exploratory data analysis, Hoagan, D., Mosteller, F., and Tukey, J., Editors. John Wiley: New York.
25
26
 
27
Teslar, L. The Smalltalk Environment, BYTE, 6,'81, 90--147.
28
29
30
31
32
33


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kevin A. Li: colleagues
Patrick Baudisch: colleagues
Ken Hinckley: colleagues