|
ABSTRACT
We evaluate two systems for automatically generating personalized interfaces adapted to the individual motor capabilities of users with motor impairments. The first system, SUPPLE, adapts to users' capabilities indirectly by first using the ARNAULD preference elicitation engine to model a user's preferences regarding how he or she likes the interfaces to be created. The second system, SUPPLE++, models a user's motor abilities directly from a set of one-time motor performance tests. In a study comparing these approaches to baseline interfaces, participants with motor impairments were 26.4% faster using ability-based user interfaces generated by SUPPLE++. They also made 73% fewer errors, strongly preferred those interfaces to the manufacturers' defaults, and found them more efficient, easier to use, and much less physically tiring. These findings indicate that rather than requiring some users with motor impairments to adapt themselves to software using separate assistive technologies, software can now adapt itself to the capabilities of its users.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., and Hasbroucq, T. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38, 4 (1995), 816--827.
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
Jeffrey P. Bigham , Ryan S. Kaminsky , Richard E. Ladner , Oscar M. Danielsson , Gordon L. Hempton, WebInSight:: making web images accessible, Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 23-25, 2006, Portland, Oregon, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1168987.1169018]
|
 |
4
|
Scott Carter , Amy Hurst , Jennifer Mankoff , Jack Li, Dynamically adapting GUIs to diverse input devices, Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 23-25, 2006, Portland, Oregon, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1168987.1169000]
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Fichten, C., Barile, M., Asuncion, J., and Fossey, M. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res, 23, 3 (2000), 191--9.
|
| |
7
|
Gajos, K., Christianson, D., Hoffmann, R., Shaked, T., Henning, K., Long, J. J., and Weld, D. S. Fast and robust interface generation for ubiquitous applications. Proc. Ubicomp'05. Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
Faustina Hwang , Simeon Keates , Patrick Langdon , John Clarkson, Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: a submovement analysis, Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, October 18-20, 2004, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
| |
14
|
International Organization for Standardization. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (2000).
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Koester, H. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. Proc. RESNA03. Atlanta, Georgia, 2003.
|
| |
17
|
Law, C., Sears, A., and Price, K. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. Proc. HCII'05. 2005.
|
| |
18
|
Littell, R., MIlliken, G., Stroup, W., and Wolfinger, R. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1996.
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
Jeffrey Nichols , Brad A. Myers , Michael Higgins , Joseph Hughes , Thomas K. Harris , Roni Rosenfeld , Mathilde Pignol, Generating remote control interfaces for complex appliances, Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 27-30, 2002, Paris, France
[doi> 10.1145/571985.572008]
|
| |
21
|
Phillips, B. and Zhao, H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol, 5, 1 (1993), 36--45.
|
| |
22
|
Savidis, A. Dynamic software assembly for automatic deployment-oriented adaptation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 127, 3 (2005), 207--217.
|
| |
23
|
Savidis, A., Antona, M., and Stephanidis, C. A decision-making specification language for verifiable user-interface adaptation logic. International Journal of Software Engineering And Knowledge Engineering, 15, 6 (2005), 1063 -- 1094.
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
Schuster, C. and Von Eye, A. The relationship of anova models with random effects and repeated measurement designs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 2 (2001), 205--220.
|
| |
26
|
Stephanidis, C. User interfaces for all: New perspectives into human-computer interaction. In C. Stephanidis, ed., User Interfaces for All, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001. 3--17.
|
| |
27
|
Vermunt, J. K. Log-linear Models for Event Histories. Sage Publications, 1997.
|
| |
28
|
Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 6 (1945), 80--83.
|
| |
29
|
Winship, C. and Mare, R. D. Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49, 4 (1984), 512--525.
|
CITED BY 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacob O. Wobbrock , James Fogarty , Shih-Yen (Sean) Liu , Shunichi Kimuro , Susumu Harada, The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
|
|