ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (737 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Adaptation table of contents
Pages 1257-1266  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Krzysztof Z. Gajos  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Jacob O. Wobbrock  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Daniel S. Weld  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 183,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357250
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We evaluate two systems for automatically generating personalized interfaces adapted to the individual motor capabilities of users with motor impairments. The first system, SUPPLE, adapts to users' capabilities indirectly by first using the ARNAULD preference elicitation engine to model a user's preferences regarding how he or she likes the interfaces to be created. The second system, SUPPLE++, models a user's motor abilities directly from a set of one-time motor performance tests. In a study comparing these approaches to baseline interfaces, participants with motor impairments were 26.4% faster using ability-based user interfaces generated by SUPPLE++. They also made 73% fewer errors, strongly preferred those interfaces to the manufacturers' defaults, and found them more efficient, easier to use, and much less physically tiring. These findings indicate that rather than requiring some users with motor impairments to adapt themselves to software using separate assistive technologies, software can now adapt itself to the capabilities of its users.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., and Hasbroucq, T. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38, 4 (1995), 816--827.
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
Fichten, C., Barile, M., Asuncion, J., and Fossey, M. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res, 23, 3 (2000), 191--9.
 
7
Gajos, K., Christianson, D., Hoffmann, R., Shaked, T., Henning, K., Long, J. J., and Weld, D. S. Fast and robust interface generation for ubiquitous applications. Proc. Ubicomp'05. Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
8
9
10
11
12
13
 
14
International Organization for Standardization. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (2000).
 
15
 
16
Koester, H. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. Proc. RESNA03. Atlanta, Georgia, 2003.
 
17
Law, C., Sears, A., and Price, K. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. Proc. HCII'05. 2005.
 
18
Littell, R., MIlliken, G., Stroup, W., and Wolfinger, R. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1996.
19
20
 
21
Phillips, B. and Zhao, H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol, 5, 1 (1993), 36--45.
 
22
Savidis, A. Dynamic software assembly for automatic deployment-oriented adaptation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 127, 3 (2005), 207--217.
 
23
Savidis, A., Antona, M., and Stephanidis, C. A decision-making specification language for verifiable user-interface adaptation logic. International Journal of Software Engineering And Knowledge Engineering, 15, 6 (2005), 1063 -- 1094.
 
24
 
25
Schuster, C. and Von Eye, A. The relationship of anova models with random effects and repeated measurement designs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 2 (2001), 205--220.
 
26
Stephanidis, C. User interfaces for all: New perspectives into human-computer interaction. In C. Stephanidis, ed., User Interfaces for All, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001. 3--17.
 
27
Vermunt, J. K. Log-linear Models for Event Histories. Sage Publications, 1997.
 
28
Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 6 (1945), 80--83.
 
29
Winship, C. and Mare, R. D. Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49, 4 (1984), 512--525.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Krzysztof Z. Gajos: colleagues
Jacob O. Wobbrock: colleagues
Daniel S. Weld: colleagues