ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization
Full text PdfPdf (491 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Visualization to Support Information Work table of contents
Pages 1237-1246  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Yedendra Babu Shrinivasan  Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (TU/e), Eindhoven, Netherlands
Jarke J. van Wijk  Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (TU/e), Eindhoven, Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 303,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357247
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new information visualization framework that supports the analytical reasoning process. It consists of three views - a data view, a knowledge view and a navigation view. The data view offers interactive information visualization tools. The knowledge view enables the analyst to record analysis artifacts such as findings, hypotheses and so on. The navigation view provides an overview of the exploration process by capturing the visualization states automatically. An analysis artifact recorded in the knowledge view can be linked to a visualization state in the navigation view. The analyst can revisit a visualization state from both the navigation and knowledge views to review the analysis and reuse it to look for alternate views. The whole analysis process can be saved along with the synthesized information. We present a user study and discuss the perceived usefulness of a prototype based on this framework that we have developed.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
M. J. Bates. Design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13:407--424, 1989.
 
3
M. I. Bauer and J. J. Laird. How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4(6):372--378, 1993.
 
4
L. Bavoil, S. Callahan, P. Crossno, J. Freire, C. Scheidegger, C. Silva, and H. Vo. Vistrails: Enabling interactive, multiple-view visualizations. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005 conference, pages 135--142. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.
 
5
J. R. Beech and A. M. Colley, editors. Cognitive Approaches to Reading, chapter Reading and working memory, pages 57--86. John Wiley & Sons, Limited, 1987.
 
6
G. D. Bhatt. Organizing knowledge in the knowledge development cycle. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1):15--26, 2000.
 
7
 
8
R. A. Burkhard. Knowledge and Information Visualization, volume 3426/2005 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Towards a Framework and a Model for Knowledge Visualization: Synergies Between Information and Knowledge Visualization, pages 238--255. Springer, 2005.
 
9
T. Buzan and B. Buzan. The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain's Untapped Potential. Penguin Books, 1993.
 
10
11
 
12
 
13
M. Derthick and S. F. Roth. Enhancing data exploration with a branching history of user operations. Knowledge-Based Systems, 14(1-2):65--74, Mar. 2001.
14
15
 
16
D. Gotz, M. X. Zhou, and V. Aggarwal. Interactive visual synthesis of analytic knowledge. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pages 51--58, October 2006.
 
17
J. Heer and M. Agrawala. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2007. VAST 2007., pages 171--178, 2007.
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
P. N. Johnson-Laird and R. Byrne, editors. Deduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., Hillsdale, NJ, 1991.
 
22
D. Jonker, W. Wright, D. Schroh, P. Proulx, and B. Cort. Information triage with TRIST. In International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, May 2-4 2005.
 
23
J. H. Larkin and H. A. Simon. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1):65--100, 1987.
 
24
 
25
J. Oakhill and A. Garnham, editors. Mental Models in Cognitive Science, chapter Models, Arguments, and Decisions, pages 95--118. Psychology Press, 1996.
 
26
P. Pirolli and S. Card. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106 (4):643--675, 1999.
 
27
P. Pirolli and S. Card. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, May 2-4 2005.
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
J. Stasko, C. Gorg, Z. Liu, and K. Singhal. Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2007. VAST 2007. IEEE Symposium on, pages 131--138, 2007.
 
32
J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, editors. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.
 
33
 
34
J. J. van Wijk. The value of visualization. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005 conference, pages 79--86. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.
 
35
F. B. Vigas and M. Wattenberg. Communication-minded visualization: A call to action. Technical Report 4, IBM Systems Journal, 2006.
36
37


Collaborative Colleagues:
Yedendra Babu Shrinivasan: colleagues
Jarke J. van Wijk: colleagues