ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia
Full text PdfPdf (371 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Shared Authoring table of contents
Pages 1101-1110  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Brian Butler  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Elisabeth Joyce  Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, PA, USA
Jacqueline Pike  University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 253,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357227
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wikis are sites that support the development of emergent, collective infrastructures that are highly flexible and open, suggesting that the systems that use them will be egalitarian, free, and unstructured. Yet it is apparent that the flexible infrastructure of wikis allows the development and deployment of a wide range of structures. However, we find that the policies in Wikipedia and the systems and mechanisms that operate around them are multi-faceted. In this descriptive study, we draw on prior work on rules and policies in organizations to propose and apply a conceptual framework for understanding the natures and roles of policies in wikis. We conclude that wikis are capable of supporting a broader range of structures and activities than other collaborative platforms. Wikis allow for and, in fact, facilitate the creation of policies that serve a wide variety of functions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Barreto, M. and N. Ellemers, The impact of anonymity and group identification on progroup behavior in computer-mediated groups. Small Group Research, 2002. 33(5): p. 590--610.
 
3
Baym, N., Interpreting soap operas and creating community: Inside a computer-mediate fan culture. Journal of Folklore Research, 1993. 30: p. 143--176.
 
4
Baym, N.K., Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. 2000, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5
 
6
Burnett, G. and L. Bonnici, Beyond the faq: Explicit and implicit norms in usenet newsgroups. Library & Information Science Research, 2003. 25(3): p. 333.
 
7
 
8
Cohen, N., Defending wikipedia's impolite side, in The New York TImes. 2007, The New York Times Company: New York, NY.
 
9
Connelly, T. and B.K. Thorn, Discretionary databases: Theory, data, and implications, in Organizations and communication technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Editors. 1990, Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA. p. 219--233.
 
10
 
11
Forte, A. and A. Bruckman, Why do people write for wikipedia? Incentives to contribute to open-content publishing, in Group 2005 Workshop - Sustaining Community: The role and design of incentive mechanisms in online systems. 2005: Sanibel Island, FL.
 
12
Galegher, J., L. Sproull, and S. Kiesler, Legitimacy, authority, and community in electronic support groups. Written Communication, 1998. 15(4): p. 493--530.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
Kennedy, H., Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society, 2006. 8(6): p. 859--876.
 
19
 
20
Kirsch, L.J., Portfolios of control modes and is project management. Information Systems Research, 1997. 8(3): p. 215--239.
 
21
 
22
Kittur, A., et al., Power of the few vs. Wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 2007: San Jose, CA.
23
 
24
Kollock, P. and M. Smith, Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities, in Computer--mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, S. Herring, Editor. 1996, John Benjamins: Amsterdam. p. 109--128.
 
25
Kuechler, W.L. and C. Vaishnavi, So, talk to me: The effect of explicit goals on the comprehension of business process narratives. MIS Quarterly, 2006. 30(4): p. 961--A16.
 
26
Lakhani, K.R. and E. von Hippel, How open source software works: "Free" User-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 2003. 32(6): p. 923--943.
27
 
28
Maney, K., Mass collaboration could change way companies operate, in USA Today. 2006.
 
29
March, J.G., M. Schulz, and X. Zhou, The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. 2000, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
 
30
McKenna, K.Y.A. and J.A. Bargh, Coming out in the age of the internet: Identity "Demarginalization" Through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 75(3): p. 681.
 
31
 
32
Ostrom, E., Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000. 14(3): p. 137--158.
 
33
Petronio, S., The boundaries of privacy: Praxis of everyday life, in Balancing the secrets of private disclosures, S. Petronio, Editor. 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, N. J. p. 37--50.
 
34
Petronio, S., et al., (mis)communicating across boundaries. Communication Research, 1998: p. 571--595.
 
35
 
36
Ren, Y., R.E. Kraut, and S. Kiesler, Applying common identity and bond theory to the design of online communities. In press, 2006.
 
37
Riva, G. and C. Galimberti, Computer-mediated communication: Identity and social interaction in an electronic environment. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 1998. 124(4): p. 434--463.
 
38
 
39
Simon, H., Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991. 2(1): p. 125--134.
 
40
 
41
Stewart, K.J. and S. Gosain, The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 2006. 30(2): p. 291--314.
42
 
43
 
44
von Krogh, G., S. Spaeth, and K.R. Lakhani, Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 2003. 32(7): p. 1217--1241.
 
45
Wikipedia contributors, Ignore all rules. 2006, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
46
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
47
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia talk:Copyrights 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
48
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia: Policies and guidelines. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
49
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Consensus. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
50
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
51
Wikipedia contributors, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. 2007, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
 
52
Zhang, X.M. and F. Zhu, Intrinsic motivation of open content contributors: The case of wikipedia, in Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. 2006: Evanston, IL.
 
53
Zlati?, V., et al., Wikipedias: Collaborative web-based encyclopedias as complex networks. Physical Review, 2006. 74(016115).


Collaborative Colleagues:
Brian Butler: colleagues
Elisabeth Joyce: colleagues
Jacqueline Pike: colleagues