| Sesame: informing user security decisions with system visualization |
| Full text |
Flv
(27:32),
Pdf
(1.34 MB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems
table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Am I Safe
table of contents
Pages 1045-1054
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
|
|
Authors
|
|
Jennifer Stoll
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
Craig S. Tashman
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
W. Keith Edwards
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
Kyle Spafford
|
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16, Downloads (12 Months): 224, Citation Count: 2
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Non-expert users face a dilemma when making security decisions. Their security often cannot be fully automated for them, yet they generally lack both the motivation and technical knowledge to make informed security decisions on their own. To help users with this dilemma, we present a novel security user interface called Sesame. Sesame uses a concrete, spatial extension of the desktop metaphor to provide users with the security-related, visualized system-level information they need to make more informed decisions. It also provides users with actionable controls to affect a system's security state. Sesame graphically facilitates users' comprehension in making these decisions, and in doing so helps to lower the bar for motivating them to participate in the security of their system. In a controlled study, users with Sesame were found to make fewer errors than a control group which suggests that our novel security interface is a viable alternative approach to helping users with their dilemma.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Gregory Conti , Kulsoom Abdullah , Julian Grizzard , John Stasko , John A. Copeland , Mustaque Ahamad , Henry L. Owen , Chris Lee, Countering Security Information Overload through Alert and Packet Visualization, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.26 n.2, p.60-70, March 2006
[doi> 10.1109/MCG.2006.30]
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Edwards, W. K., Shehan, E., Stoll, J. Security Automation Considered Harmful? NSPW (2007)
|
| |
6
|
Flinn, S.A., Flock of Birds, Safely Staged. DIMACS Workshop on Usable Privacy & Security Software (2005).
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Hutchins, E., Hollan, J., Norman, D. Direct Manipulation Interfaces. Human Computer Interaction, 1985. 1: p. 311--338.
|
| |
9
|
Know Your Enemy: Tracking Botnets. Honeynet Project and Research Alliance. honeynet.org/papers/bots (2005).
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Spyware. NISCC Technical Note. National Infrastructure Security Coordination Centre. (2006).
|
| |
14
|
Thorpe, S., Fize, D. & Marlot, C. (1996).Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520--522.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Whalen, T., Inkpen, K. Techniques for Visual Feedback of Security State. DIMACS Workshop on Usable Privacy and Security Software (2004).
|
| |
17
|
Whitten, A., Tygar, J. Safe Security Staging. CHI 2003 Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Security Systems (2003).
|
| |
18
|
Whitten, A., Tygar, J., Why Johnny Can't Encrypt. Proc. of the 8th USENIX Security Symposium (1999).
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/
|
CITED BY 2
|
|
Predrag Klasnja , Sunny Consolvo , Jaeyeon Jung , Benjamin M. Greenstein , Louis LeGrand , Pauline Powledge , David Wetherall, "When I am on Wi-Fi, I am fearless": privacy concerns & practices in eeryday Wi-Fi use, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
|
|
|
|
|