ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Demonstrating the feasibility of using forearm electromyography for muscle-computer interfaces
Full text PdfPdf (1.18 MB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Physiological Sensing for Input table of contents
Pages 515-524  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
T Scott Saponas  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Desney S. Tan  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Dan Morris  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Ravin Balakrishnan  University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 231,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357138
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We explore the feasibility of muscle-computer interfaces (muCIs): an interaction methodology that directly senses and decodes human muscular activity rather than relying on physical device actuation or user actions that are externally visible or audible. As a first step towards realizing the mu-CI concept, we conducted an experiment to explore the potential of exploiting muscular sensing and processing technologies for muCIs. We present results demonstrating accurate gesture classification with an off-the-shelf electromyography (EMG) device. Specifically, using 10 sensors worn in a narrow band around the upper forearm, we were able to differentiate position and pressure of finger presses, as well as classify tapping and lifting gestures across all five fingers. We conclude with discussion of the implications of our results for future muCI designs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Barry, D.T., Gordon, K.E. & Hinton, G.G. (1990). Acoustic and surface EMG diagnosis of pediatric muscle disease. Muscle & Nerve, 13(4), 286--290.
 
2
Basmajian, J.V., & De Luca, C.J. (1985). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography, 5th edition. Williams & Wilkins: Fort Worth, Texas.
 
3
Biosemi. http://www.biosemi.com.
 
4
5
6
 
7
Hartmann, B., Benson, M., Junger, A., Quinzio, L., Röhrig, R., Fengler B., Färber, U.W., Wille B., & Hem-pelmann, G. (2004). Computer keyboard and mouse as a reservoir of pathogens in intensive care unit. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 18(1), 7--12.
 
8
Hernandez, A., Katoh, R., Yokoi, H., & Yu, W. (2006). Development of a multi-DOF electromyography prosthetic system using the adaptive joint mechanism. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 3(2), 101--112.
9
 
10
Jiang, M.W., Wang, R.C., Wang, J.Z., & Jin, D.W. (2005). A method of recognizing finger motion using wavelet transform of surface EMG signal. Intl Conf. of the IEEE EMBS, 1(7), 2672--2674.
 
11
Kiguchi, K., Tanaka, T., & Fukuda, T. (2004). Neuro-fuzzy control of a robotic exoskeleton with EMG signals. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 12(4), 481--490.
 
12
Kine Biomedical Engineering. http://www.kine.is.
 
13
Lanyi, X., & Adler, A. (2004). An improved method for muscle activation detection during gait. Canadian Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 357--360.
14
 
15
Manabe, H., Hiraiwa, A. & Sugimura, T. (2003). A ring-shaped EMG measurement system for applying to user interface. Intl. Conf. of the IEEE EMBS, 3020--3023.
16
 
17
Merletti, R., & Parker, P.A. (2004). Electromyography: Physiology, engineering, and noninvasive applications. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey.
 
18
Moseley, J.B., Jobe, F.W., Pink, M., Perry, J., & Tibone, J. (1992). EMG analysis of the scapular muscles during a shoulder rehabilitation program. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 20, 128--134.
 
19
 
20
Peleg, D., Braiman, E., Yom-Tov, E., & Inbar, G. (2002). Classification of finger activation for use in a robotic prosthesis arm. IEEE Trans. on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 10(4), 290--293.
 
21
Platt, J. (1998). Sequential Minimal Optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14.
 
22
Raez, M.B.I., Hussain, M.S., & Mohd-Yasin, F. (2006). Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification, and applications. Biological Procedures Online, 8, 11--35.
 
23
Schieber, M.H. (1995). Muscular production of individual finger movements: the roles of extrinsic finger muscles. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(1), 248--297.
 
24
 
25


Collaborative Colleagues:
T Scott Saponas: colleagues
Desney S. Tan: colleagues
Dan Morris: colleagues
Ravin Balakrishnan: colleagues