ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Attention by proxy? issues in audience awareness for webcasts to distributed groups
Full text PdfPdf (220 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Florence, Italy
SESSION: Don't Interrupt Me table of contents
Pages 103-106  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-011-1
Authors
Jeremy Birnholtz  Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Clarissa Mak  University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Saul Greenberg  University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Ron Baecker  University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 117,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357071
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Instructor/student interaction in e-learning environments can positively impact both student learning and instructor satisfaction. In online webcast lectures, however, interaction can be difficult because instructors lack basic awareness information about their remote students. Our goal is to better understand the kinds of awareness information that instructors should have if they are to interact frequently and effectively with their students in e-learning environments. We conducted an exploratory study -- via interviews and observations -- of instructor attention in face-to-face classrooms at a large university. Our results imply that a webcast system should provide instructors with overview and detailed data about their students, but that this detailed information should not be displayed publicly.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, T. Getting the mix right again: an updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4, 2 (2003).
 
2
 
3
Bligh, D.A. What's the use of lectures. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2000.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
 
11
Kastner, S. and Ungerleider, L.G. Mechanisms of Visual Attention in the Human Cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, (2000). 315--341.
 
12
Matthews, T., Rattenbury, T. and Carter, S. Defining, designing and evaluating peripheral displays: An analysis using activity theory. HCI, 22, 1 (2007). 221--261.
 
13
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994.
 
14
Shea, P., Picket, A. and Li, C.S. Increasing access to higher education: A study of the diffusion of online teaching among 913 college faculty. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6, 2 (2005).
 
15
Webster, J. and Hackley, P. Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6 (1997). 1282--1309.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeremy Birnholtz: colleagues
Clarissa Mak: colleagues
Saul Greenberg: colleagues
Ron Baecker: colleagues