ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust gate sizing via mean excess delay minimization
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Physical Design archive
Proceedings of the 2008 international symposium on Physical design table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Physical optimization techniques with buffering and gate sizing table of contents
Pages 10-14  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-048-7
Authors
Jason Cong  University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
John Lee  University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Lieven Vandenberghe  University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 43,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1353629.1353634
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce mean excess delay as a statistical measure of circuit delay in the presence of parameter variations. The β-mean excess delay is defined as the expected delay of the circuits that exceed the β-quantile of the delay, so it is always an upper bound on the β-quantile. However, in contrast to the β-quantile, it preserves the convexity properties of the underlying delay distribution. We apply the β-mean excess delay to the circuit sizing problem, and use it to minimize the delay quantile over the gate sizes. We use the Analytic Centering Cutting Plane Method to perform the minimization and apply this sizing to the ISCAS '85 benchmarks. Depending on the structure of the circuit, it can make significant improvements on the 95% quantile


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
4
 
5
C. Chen, C. Chu, and D. Wong. Fast and exact simultaneous gate and wire sizing by lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, 18(7):1014--1025, 1999.
6
 
7
L. He, A. Kahng, K. Tam, and J. Xiong. Simultaneous buffer insertion and wire sizing considering systemic CMP variation and random Leff variation. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design, 26(5):845--857, 2007.
 
8
S. Joshi and S. Boyd. An efficient method for large-scale gate sizing. Submitted for publication, available at http://www.stanford.edu/~boyd/gatesizing.html.
 
9
 
10
MOSEK ApS. The MOSEK Optimization Tools Version 5.0. Available from http://www.mosek.com.
 
11
 
12
M. Pelgrom, A. Duinmaijer, and A. Welbers. Matching properties of MOS transistors. In IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 24(5):1433--1439, 1989.
 
13
R. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3):21--41, 2000.
14
 
15
16
17
 
18
V. Wang, K. Agarwal, S. Nassif, K. Nowka, and D. Markovic. A design model for random process variability. To appear in ISQED '08.
19
20

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jason Cong: colleagues
John Lee: colleagues
Lieven Vandenberghe: colleagues