ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Synthesizing structured text from logical database subsets
Full text PdfPdf (466 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 261 archive
Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Extending database technology: Advances in database technology table of contents
Nantes, France
SESSION: Research sessions: Schema management table of contents
Pages 428-439  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-926-5
Authors
Alkis Simitsis  IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, California
Georgia Koutrika  Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
Yannis Alexandrakis  National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Hellas
Yannis Ioannidis  University of Athens, Athens, Hellas
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1353343.1353396
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the classical database world, information access has been based on a paradigm that involves structured, schema-aware, queries and tabular answers. In the current environment, however, where information prevails in most activities of society, serving people, applications, and devices in dramatically increasing numbers, this paradigm has proved to be very limited. On the query side, much work has been done on moving towards keyword queries over structured data. In our previous work, we have touched the other side as well, and have proposed a paradigm that generates entire databases in response to keyword queries. In this paper, we continue in the same direction and propose synthesizing textual answers in response to queries of any kind over structured data. In particular, we study the transformation of a dynamically-generated logical database subset into a narrative through a customizable, extensible, and templatebased process. In doing so, we exploit the structured nature of database schemas and describe three generic translation modules for different formations in the schema, called unary, split, and join modules. We have implemented the proposed translation procedure into our own database front end and have performed several experiments evaluating the textual answers generated as several features and parameters of the system are varied. We have also conducted a set of experiments measuring the effectiveness of such answers on users. The overall results are very encouraging and indicate the promise that our approach has for several applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
www.diligentproject.org.
 
2
 
3
I. Androutsopoulos, G. D. Ritchie, and P. Thanisch. Natural language interfaces to databases - an introduction. CoRR, cmp-lg/9503016, 1995.
 
4
AT&T Labs Inc. - Research. Text-to-speech (TTS), The synthesis of audible speech from text. url: http://www.research.att.com/ttsweb/tts/index.php#top, March 2007.
 
5
Bell Labs. Text-to-speech synthesis. url: http://www.bell-labs.com/project/tts, March 2007.
 
6
 
7
P. Dixon. Basics of Oracle text retrieval. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 24(4):11--14, 2001.
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
J. R. Hamilton and T. K. Nayak. Microsoft SQL server full-text search. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 24(4):7--10, 2001.
 
12
 
13
V. Hristidis, Y. Papakonstantinou, and A. Balmin. Keyword proximity search on XML graphs. In ICDE, pages 367--378, 2003.
 
14
 
15
 
16
A. Maier and D. E. Simmen. DB2 optimization in support of full text search. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., 24(4):3--6, 2001.
 
17
 
18
 
19
M. Minock. A phrasal approach to natural language interfaces over databases. In NLDB, pages 333--336, 2005.
 
20
 
21
A. Simitsis and G. Koutrika. Comprehensible answers to précis queries. In CAiSE, pages 142--156, 2006.
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
A. Toral, E. Noguera, F. Llopis, and R. Muñoz. Improving question answering using named entity recognition. In NLDB, pages 181--191, 2005.
 
27
Q. Wang, C. Nass, and J. Hu. Natural language query vs. keyword search: Effects of task complexity on search performance, participant perceptions, and preferences. In INTERACT, pages 106--116, 2005.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Alkis Simitsis: colleagues
Georgia Koutrika: colleagues
Yannis Alexandrakis: colleagues
Yannis Ioannidis: colleagues