ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Comparison of innovative signature algorithms for WSNs
Full text PdfPdf (227 KB)
Source
Conference On Wireless Network Security archive
Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Wireless network security table of contents
Alexandria, VA, USA
SESSION: Authentication in wireless networks table of contents
Pages 30-35  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-814-5
Authors
Benedikt Driessen  escrypt GmbH, Bochum, Germany
Axel Poschmann  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Christof Paar  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 212,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1352533.1352539
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

For many foreseen applications of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) - for example monitoring the structural health of a bridge - message integrity is a crucial requirement. Usually, security services such as message integrity are realized by symmetric cryptography only, because asymmetric cryptography is often stated as impracticable for WSN. However, the proposed solutions for symmetric key establishment introduce a significant computation, storage, and - most important - communication overhead. Digital signatures and key-exchange based on asymmetric algorithms would be very valuable though. In the literature nearly only RSA and ECC are implemented and compared for sensor nodes, though there exist a variety of innovative asymmetric algorithms. To close this gap, we investigated the efficiency and suitability of digital signature algorithms based on innovative asymmetric primitives for WSN. We chose XTR-DSA and NTRUSign and implemented both (as well as ECDSA) for MICAz motes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Digital Signature Standard (DSS). Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 186, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), May 1994.
 
2
A. A. Karatsuba and Y. Ofman. Multiplication of Many-Digital Numbers by Automatic Computers. Soviet Physics-Doklad, 7:595--596, 1963.
 
3
 
4
 
5
Atmel Corporation. AVR Studio, 4.12.490, Service Pack 3. http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/tools_card.asp?tool_id=2725.
 
6
Crossbow Technology Inc. MPR-MIB Users Manual - Revision A. available via http://www.xbow.com/Support/Support_pdf_files/MPR-MIB_Series_Users_Manual.pdf, June 2007.
 
7
B. Driessen. Efficient Embedded Implementation of Security Solutions for ad-hoc Networks. Master's thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum, http://www.crypto.rub.de/theses.html, September 2007.
 
8
 
9
N. Gura, A. Patel, A. Wander, H. Eberle, and S. C. Shantz. Elliptic curve cryptography and RSA on 8-bit CPUs. In Proceedings of Workshop on Crpytographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES 2004), 6th International Workshop, pages 119 --132, 2004.
 
10
N. Gura, A. Patel, A. Wander, H. Eberle, and S. C. Shantz. Comparing Elliptic Curve Cryptography and RSA on 8-bit CPUs. Proceedings of Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (CHES 2004), 6th International Workshop, pages 119--132, 2004.
 
11
 
12
J. Hoffstein, N. Howgrave-Graham, J. Pipher, J. H. Silverman, and W. Whyte. NTRUSign: Digital signatures using the NTRU lattice. In Proceedings of the RSA conference, 2003.
 
13
14
 
15
J. Hoffstein and N. Howgrave-Graham and J. Pipher and J. H. Silverman and W. Whyte. Performance Improvements and a Baseline Parameter Generation Algorithm for NTRUSign, 2005.
 
16
D. Johnson and A. Menezes. The ellipcit curve digital signature algorithm (ECDSA), 1999.
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
A. Liu and P. Ning. TinyECC: A Configurable Library for Elliptic Curve Cryptography in Wireless Sensor Networks. Technical Report TR-2007-36, North Carolina State University, Department of Computer Science, November 2007.
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
N/A. DSTU X9.98 Draft 9 - Lattice-Based Polynomial Public Key Establishment Algorithm for the Financial Services Industries. Technical report, Accredited Standards Commitee X9 Incorporated, 22. 2007.
 
25
Certicom Research. SEC 2: Recommended Elliptic Curve Domain Parameters. Standards for Efficient Cryptography Version 1.0, 2000.
26
 
27
J. H. Silverman. High Speed Multiplication of (Truncated) Polynomials. Technical Report 10, NTRU, 1999.
 
28
 
29
L. Uhsadel. Comparison of Low-Power Public Key Cryptography on MICAz 8-bit Micro Controllers. Master's thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum, 2007.
 
30
Leif Uhsadel, Axel Poschmann, and Christof Paar. Enabling Full-Size Public-key Algorithms on 8-bit Sensor Nodes. In Proceedings of ESAS 2007, volume 4572 of LNCS, pages 73--86, 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Benedikt Driessen: colleagues
Axel Poschmann: colleagues
Christof Paar: colleagues