An experimental study of cooperative learning in cs1

ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted to study the effectiveness of the cooperative learning approach to teaching CS1. The cooperative learning exercises, which used specific roles to focus students' attention on key concepts, were designed so they could be used in a variety of educational settings. Experimental results show that the benefits of cooperative learning clearly outweighed any possible losses due to reduced lecture time. These benefits were enjoyed by both male and female students, and by students from a variety of majors. Majority and minority students performed at approximately the same overall level when using the cooperative learning approach. There are indications that the educational benefits continue when students who had a cooperative learning experience in CS1 go on to CS2.

REFERENCES

• 1: Leland L. Beck , Alexander W. Chizhik , Amy C. McElroy, Cooperative learning techniques in CS1: design and experimental evaluation, Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 23-27, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
• 2: J. D. Chase , Edward G. Okie, Combining cooperative learning and peer instruction in introductory computer science, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.372-376, March 07-12, 2000, Austin, Texas, United States
• 3: David Finkel , Craig E. Wills, Computer supported peer learning in an introductory computer science course, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.28 n.SI, p.55-56, 1996
• 4: Graciela Gonzalez, A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2, Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-05, 2006, Houston, Texas, USA
• 5: Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, F. P., Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills, Prentice-Hall, 1975.
• 6: Johnson, D. W. and Johnson, R. T., Learning Together and Alone (4th edition), Allyn and Bacon, 1994.
• 7: Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A., Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, Interaction Book Company, 1991.
• 8: Keeler, C. and Anson, R., "An Assessment of Cooperative Learning Used for Basic Computer Skills Instruction in the College Classroom," Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1995, pp. 379--393.
• 9: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather Bullock , Julian Fernald, The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course, Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, February 27-March 03, 2002, Cincinnati, Kentucky
• 10: Nelson, C. E., "Student Diversity Requires Different Approaches to College Teaching, Even in Math and Science," American Behavioral Scientist, 1996, pp. 165--175.
• 11: Richard E. Pattis , Jim Roberts , Mark Stehlik, Karel the robot (2nd ed.): a gentle introduction to the art of programming, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1995
• 12: Priebe, R., "The Effects of Cooperative Learning in a Second-Semester University Computer Science Course," National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 1997 (available as ERIC document ED406189).
• 13: Sharan, S., Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods, Greenwood Press, 1994.
• 14: Slavin, R. E., Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd edition), Prentice Hall, 1995.
• 15: Troeger, D., "Formal Methods, Design, and Collaborative Learning in the First Computer Science Course," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995, pp. 55--66.
• 16: Henry M. Walker, Collaborative learning: a case study for CS1 at Grinnell College and Austin, Proceedings of the twenty-eighth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, p.209-213, February 27-March 01, 1997, San Jose, California, United States
• 17: Laurie Williams , Lucas Layman , Kelli M. Slaten , Sarah B. Berenson , Carolyn Seaman, On the Impact of a Collaborative Pedagogy on African American Millennial Students in Software Engineering, Proceedings of the 29th international conference on Software Engineering, p.677-687, May 20-26, 2007 [doi>10.1109/ICSE.2007.58]
• 18: Williams, L., Wiebe, E., Yang, K., Ferzli, M. and Miller, C., "In Support of Pair Programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course," Computer Science Education, September 2002, pp. 197--212.
• 19: Craig E. Wills , David Finkel , Michael A. Gennert , Matthew O. Ward, Peer learning in an introductory computer science course, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth SIGCSE symposium on Computer science education, p.309-313, March 10-12, 1994, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 20: Kathie A. Yerion , Jane A. Rinehart, Guidelines for collaborative learning in computer science, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.27 n.4, p.29-34, Dec. 1995 [doi>10.1145/216511.216529]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Curriculum

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
classroom management, cooperative learning, cs1, pedagogy