ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The uses of social television
Full text PdfPdf (302 KB)
Source Computers in Entertainment (CIE) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 1  (January 2008) table of contents
Social television and user interaction
SECTION: Social television and user interaction table of contents
Article No. 8  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1544-3574
Authors
Gunnar Harboe  Motorola, Schaumburg, IL
Noel Massey  Motorola, Schaumburg, IL
Crysta Metcalf  Motorola, Schaumburg, IL
David Wheatley  Motorola, Schaumburg, IL
Guy Romano  Motorola, Schaumburg, IL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 269,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1350843.1350851
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present the results of two studies on social television concepts. In one study, a social TV prototype was tested in the field, allowing groups of users watching television at home to talk to each other over an audio link. Specific patterns of use are described, showing that users did perceive the system as valuable. In another study, focus groups were presented with several social TV concepts, and their responses were collected. These participants saw only moderate to marginal value in the concept. We discuss the discrepancy with reference to the limitations of each method. Based on our analysis, we conclude that our social television experience provides user value under certain favorable conditions. Participants deal with potential conflicts between conversation and television audio without the need for additional technical support, and there is no indication that a video link would improve the experience. However, designing for the social dynamics at the beginnings, ends, and outside of conversations remains an open challenge.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
BERNARD, H.R. (ed.). 1998. Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology. AltaMira, Walnut Creek, CA.
 
4
 
5
BOERTJES, E. 2007, ConnecTV: Share the experience. In Proceedings of EuroITV 2007 (TICSP), 139-140.
 
6
 
7
BROOM, T. 2006. Philips AOLTV review. CNET Reviews (Feb. 19, 2001). http://reviews.cnet.com/Philips_AOLTV/4505-6487_7-4772942.html. Accessed Dec. 2006. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS. 2007. American Time Use Survey. 2006 Results. (June 28, 2007). ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/atus.txt. Acessed Aug. 2007.
 
8
CESAR, P., BULTERMAN, D.C.A., AND JANSEN, A.J. 2006. An architecture for end-user TV content enrichment. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 39-47.
 
9
CHUAH, M. 2002. Reality instant messenger. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Personalization in Future TV (Malaga Spain), 65-74.
 
10
COATES, T. 2005. Social software for set-top boxes. http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2005/03/social_software_for_settop_boxes/.
 
11
COPPENS, T., TRAPPENIERS, L., AND GODON, M. 2004. AmigoTV: Towards a social TV experience. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2004 Conference (Brighton, UK).
 
12
CULLINAN, C. AND AGAMANOLIS, S. 2003. Reflexion: A responsive virtual mirror for interpersonal communication. In the ECSCW 2003 Conference Supplement (Helsinki).
 
13
FINK, M., COVELL, M., AND BALUJA, S. 2006. Socialand interactive television: Applications based on real-time ambient-audio identification. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 138-146.
14
15
 
16
GHITTINO, A., IATRINO, A., MODEO, S., AND RICCHIUTI, F. 2007. Living@Room: A TV-based social experience for multimedia content streaming. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 207-212.
 
17
GOLDENBERG, S. 2007. DVRs and micro-social networking-Recreating the shared watching experience of TV. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 213-217.
 
18
HARRISON, C. AND AMENTO, B. 2007. CollaboraTV: Using asynchronous communication to make TV social again. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP), 218-222.
 
19
HEß, J. 2007. Supporting community building in iTV environments. In: Proceedings of the EuroITV 2007 Conference (TICSP),129-130.
 
20
HU, J. 2003. America Online confirms end of AOLTV. CNET News.com (Feb. 18, 2003). http://news.com.com/2100-1023-984920.html. Accessed Dec. 2006.
 
21
LULL, J. 1990. The social uses of television. In Inside Family Viewing, Routledge, New York, 28-48.
22
 
23
METCALF, C. AND HARBOE, G. 2006. Sunday is family day. In Proceedings of the EPIC 2006 Conference (Portland, OR).
 
24
NIELSEN 2006. Nielsen top TV ratings. 2006. http://www.nielsenmedia.com/. Accessed Dec. 2006.
 
25
NOLL, A.M. 1992. Anatomy of a failure: Picturephone revisited. Telecommunications Policy 16, 4, (May/June 1), 307-316.
 
26
OEHLBERG, L., DUCHENEAUT, N., THORNTON, J.D., MOORE, R.J., AND NICKELL, E. 2006. Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2006 Conference (Athens), 251-259.
 
27
QUICO, C. 2003. Are communication services the killer app for interactive TV? In Proceedings of the EuroITV 2003 Conference (Brighton, UK), 99-107.
 
28
U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. 2006. America's families and living arrangements:2006. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2005.html.
29

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Gunnar Harboe: colleagues
Noel Massey: colleagues
Crysta Metcalf: colleagues
David Wheatley: colleagues
Guy Romano: colleagues