ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Development and evaluation of a flexible interface for a wheelchair mounted robotic arm
Full text PdfPdf (4.73 MB)
Source
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction table of contents
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
SESSION: Technical papers table of contents
Pages: 105-112  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-017-3
Authors
Katherine Tsui  University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
Holly Yanco  University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
David Kontak  Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center, Greenfield, NH, USA
Linda Beliveau  Crotched Mountain Rehabilitation Center, Greenfield, NH, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 106,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1349822.1349837
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Accessibility is a challenge for people with disabilities. Differences in cognitive ability, sensory impairments, motor dexterity, behavioral skills, and social skills must be taken into account when designing interfaces for assistive devices. Flexible interfaces tuned for individuals, instead of custom-built solutions, may benefit a larger number of people. The development and evaluation of a flexible interface for controlling a wheelchair mounted robotic arm is described in this paper. There are four versions of the interface based on input device (touch screen or joystick) and a moving or stationary shoulder camera. We describe results from an eight week experiment conducted with representative end users who range in physical and cognitive ability.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Agarwal. MS Thesis: User Modeling for Individuals with Disabilities. Univ. of Pittsburgh, 2005.
 
2
P. Athanasiou, N. Chawla, and E. Leichtnam. Assistive robotic manipulator interface. In IEEE 32nd Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, pages 171--172, Easton, PA, 2006.
 
3
 
4
B. Driessen, F. Liefhebber, T. Kate, and K. Van Woerden. Collaborative control of the manus manipulator. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 247--251, June 2005.
 
5
C. Dune, C. Leroux, and E. Marchand. Intuitive human interactive with an arm robot for severely handicapped people - a one click approach. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'2007, pages 582--589, The Netherlands, June 2007.
 
6
Exact Dynamics. Assistive robotic manipulator. In http://www.exactdynamics.nl/, September 2007.
 
7
M. Ghorbel, R. Kadouche, and M. Mokhtari. User & service modeling in assistive environment to enhance accessibility of dependent people. In ICTA, April 2007.
 
8
T. King. Assistive Technology: Essential Human Factors. Allyn & Bacon, 1999.
 
9
C. Leroux, M. Guerrand, C. Leroy, Y. Measson, and B. Boukarri. Magritte: a graphic supervisor for remote handling interventions. In ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation, ASTRA 2004, The Netherlands, Nov. 2004.
 
10
MedFriendly. Medfriendly.com: Functional independence measure. In http://www.medfriendly.com/functionalindependencemeasure.html, September 2007.
 
11
 
12
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. Robots as assistive technology - does appearance matter? In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, September 2004.
 
13
B. Scassellati. Quantitative metrics of social response for autism diagnosis. Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on, pages 585--590, 2005.
14
 
15
 
16
C. Tan, W. Yu, and G. McAllister. ENABLED Adaptive Architecture to Improve Internet Accessibility. Proc. 2nd Int'l. Conf. on Enactive Interfaces, 2005.
 
17
H. Tijsma, F. Liefhebber, and J. Herder. Evaluation of new user interface features for the manus robot arm. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR'2005, pages 258--263, June 2005.
 
18
K. Tsui and H. Yanco. Simplifying wheelchair mounted robotic arm control with a visual interface. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, pages 247--251, Palo Alto, CA, March 2007.
 
19
University of Texas Austin. Accessibility and disability defined. In http://www.utexas.edu/learn/accessibility/disability.html, December 2007.
 
20
G. Vanderheiden. Universal design and assistive technology in communication and information technologies: alternatives or complements? Assist Technol, 10(1):29--36, 1998.
 
21
R. Woodworth. The accuracy of voluntary movement. In Psychology Review Monograph Supplement, 1899.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Katherine Tsui: colleagues
Holly Yanco: colleagues
David Kontak: colleagues
Linda Beliveau: colleagues