ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning to rank typed graph walks: local and global approaches
Full text PdfPdf (367 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis table of contents
San Jose, California
Pages 1-8  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-1-59593-848-0
Authors
Einat Minkov  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
William W. Cohen  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1348549.1348550
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We consider the setting of lazy random graph walks over directed graphs, where entities are represented as nodes and typed edges represent the relations between them. This framework has been used in a variety of problems to derive an extended measure of entity similarity. In this paper we contrast two different approaches for applying supervised learning in this framework to improve graph walk performance: a gradient descent algorithm that tunes the transition probabilities of the graph, and a reranking approach that uses features describing global properties of the traversed paths. An empirical evaluation on a set of tasks from the domain of personal information management and multiple corpora show that reranking performance is usually superior to the local gradient descent algorithm, and that the methods often yield best results when combined.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
M. Barthelemy, E. Chow, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Knowledge representation issues in semantic graphs for relationship detection. In AAAI Spring Symposium, 2005.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
W. W. Cohen and E. Minkov. A graph-search framework for associating gene identifiers with documents. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(440), 2006.
 
9
W. W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. Fienberg. A comparison of string distance metrics for name-matching tasks. In IIWEB, 2003.
 
10
W. W. Cohen, R. E. Schapire, and Y. Singer. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 10:243--270, 1999.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
M. Diligenti, M. Gori, and M. Maggini. Learning web page scores by error back-propagation. In IJCAI, 2005.
15
 
16
T. Hughes and D. Ramage. Lexical semantic relatedness with random graph walks. In EMNLP, 2007.
17
 
18
B. Klimt and Y. Yang. The enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In ECML, 2004.
 
19
E. Minkov and W. W. Cohen. An email and meeting assistant using graph walks. In CEAS, 2006.
20
 
21
J. Neville and D. Jensen. Data mining in social networks. In National Academy of Sciences Symposium on Dynamic Social Network Analysis, 2002.
22
 
23
L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. In Technical Report, Computer Science department, Stanford University, 1998.
24
 
25
26
27
 
28
B. Zhao, P. Sen, and L. Getoor. Entity and relationship labeling in affiliation networks. In ICML Workshop on Statistical Network Analysis, 2006.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Einat Minkov: colleagues
William W. Cohen: colleagues