ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Competitive queue management for latency sensitive packets
Full text PdfPdf (452 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages 228-237  
Year of Publication: 2008
Authors
Amos Fiat  Tel Aviv University
Yishay Mansour  Tel Aviv University
Uri Nadav  Tel Aviv University
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We consider the online problem of non-preemptive queue management. An online sequence of packets arrive, each of which has an associated intrinsic value. Packets can be accepted to a FIFO queue, or discarded. The profit gained by transmitting a packet diminishes over time and is equal to its value minus the delay. This corresponds to the well known and strongly motivated Naor's model in operations research.

We give a queue management algorithm with a competitive ratio equal to the golden ratio (φ ≈ 1.618) in the case that all packets have the same value, along with a matching lower bound. We also derive Θ(1) upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio when packets have different intrinsic values (in the case of differentiated services). We can extend our results to deal with more general models for loss of value over time.

Finally, we re-interpret our online algorithms in the context of selfish agents, producing an online mechanism that approximates the optimal social welfare to within a constant factor.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
N. Andelman and Y. Mansour. Competitive management of non-preemptive queues with multiple values. In DISC, pages 166--180, 2003.
 
3
 
4
F. Y. L. Chin, M. Chrobak, S. P. Y. Fung, W. Jawor, J. Sgall, and T. Tichy. Online competitive algorithms for maximizing weighted throughput of unit jobs. Journal of Discrete Algorithms, 4(2):255--276, 2006.
 
5
F. Y. L. Chin and S. P. Y. Fung. Online scheduling with partial job values: Does timesharing or randomization help? Algorithmica, 37(3):149--164, 2003.
 
6
 
7
R. Hassin. On the optimality of first come last served queues. Econometrica, 53(1):201--202, 1985.
 
8
R. Hassin and M. Haviv. To Queue or not to Queue: Equilibrium Behavior in Queueing Systems. Kluwer Apademic Publishers, 2003.
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
P. Naor. The regulation of queue size by levying tolls. Econometrica, 37(1):15--24, 1969.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Amos Fiat: colleagues
Yishay Mansour: colleagues
Uri Nadav: colleagues