|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
We consider the problem of minimizing average latency cost while obliviously routing traffic in a network with linear latency functions. This is roughly equivalent to minimizing the function Σe(load(e))2, where for a network link e, load(e) denotes the amount of traffic that has to be forwarded by the link. We show that for the case when all routing requests are directed to a single target, there is a routing scheme with competitive ratio O(log n, where n denotes the number of nodes in the network. As a lower bound we show that no oblivious scheme can obtain a competitive ratio of better than Ω(√log n). This latter result gives a qualitative difference in the performance that can be achieved by oblivious algorithms and by adaptive online algorithms, respectively, since there exist a constant competitive online routing algorithm for the cost-measure of average latency [2]. Such a qualitative difference (in general undirected networks) between the performance of online algorithms and oblivious algorithms was not known for other cost measures (e.g. edge-congestion). REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
Additional Classification:
Collaborative Colleagues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||