ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Efficient reductions among lattice problems
Full text PdfPdf (377 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages 84-93  
Year of Publication: 2008
Author
Daniele Micciancio  University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We give various deterministic polynomial time reductions among approximation problems on point lattices. Our reductions are both efficient and robust, in the sense that they preserve the rank of the lattice and approximation factor achieved. Our main result shows that for any γ ≥ 1, approximating all the successive minima of a lattice (and, in particular, approximately solving the Shortest Independent Vectors Problem, SIVPγ) within a factor γ reduces under deterministic polynomial time rank-preserving reductions to approximating the Closest Vector Problem (CVP) within the same factor γ. This solves an open problem posed by Blömer in (ICALP 2000). As an application, we obtain faster algorithms for the exact solution of SIVP that run in time n! · sO(1) (where n is the rank of the lattice, and s the size of the input,) improving on the best previously known solution of Blömer (ICALP 2000) by a factor 3n. We also show that SIVP, CVP and many other lattice problems are equivalent in their exact version under deterministic polynomial time rank-preserving reductions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Ajtai. Generating hard instances of lattice problems. Complexity of Computations and Proofs, Quaderni di Matematica, 13:1--32, 2004. Preliminary version in STOC 1996.
3
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
W. Banaszczyk. New bounds in some transference theorems in the geometry of numbers. Mathematische Annalen, 296:625--635, 1993.
 
8
 
9
J. Blömer and S. Naewe. Sampling methods for shortest vectors, closest vectors and successive minima. In Proceedings of ICALP '07, volume 4596 of LNCS, pages 65--77. Springer, July 2007.
10
 
11
E. F. Brickell and A. M. Odlyzko. Cryptanalysis: A survey of recent results. In G. J. Simmons, editor, Contemporary Cryptology, chapter 10, pages 501--540. IEEE Press, 1991.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
V. Guruswami, D. Micciancio, and O. Regev. The complexity of the covering radius problem. Computational Complexity, 14(2):90--120, 2005. Preliminary version in CCC 2004.
18
 
19
A. Joux and J. Stern. Lattice reduction: A toolbox for the cryptanalyst. Journal of Cryptology, 11(3):161--185, 1998.
 
20
21
 
22
A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra, Jr., and L. Lovász. Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients. Mathematische Annalen, 261(4):513--534, Dec. 1982.
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
29
 
30