ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Succinct approximate convex pareto curves
Full text PdfPdf (385 KB)
Source Symposium on Discrete Algorithms archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms table of contents
San Francisco, California
Pages 74-83  
Year of Publication: 2008
Authors
Ilias Diakonikolas  Columbia University, New York, NY
Mihalis Yannakakis  Columbia University, New York, NY
Sponsors
: SIAM Activity Group on Discrete Mathematics
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics  Philadelphia, PA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

We study the succinct approximation of convex Pareto curves of multiobjective optimization problems. We propose the concept of ε-convex Pareto (ε-CP) set as the appropriate one for the convex setting, and observe that it can offer arbitrarily more compact representations than ε-Pareto sets in this context. We characterize when an ε-CP can be constructed in polynomial time in terms of an efficient routine Comb for optimizing (exactly or approximately) monotone linear combinations of the objectives. We investigate the problem of computing minimum size ε-convex Pareto sets, both for discrete (combinatorial) and continuous (convex) problems, and present general algorithms using a Comb routine. For bi-objective problems, we show that if we have an exact Comb optimization routine, then we can compute the minimum ε-CP for continuous problems (this applies for example to bi-objective Linear Programming and Markov Decision Processes), and factor 2 approximation to the minimum ε-CP for discrete problems (this applies for example to bi-objective versions of polynomial-time solvable combinatorial problems such as Shortest Paths, Spanning Tree, etc.). If we have an approximate Comb routine, then we can compute factor 3 and 6 approximations respectively to the minimum ε-CP for continuous and discrete bi-objective problems. We consider also the case of three and more objectives and present some upper and lower bounds.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
{BG} H. Brönnimann, M. T. Goodrich Almost Optimal Set Covers in Finite VC-Dimension. Discrete and Computational Geometry, 14(4): 463--479 (1995).
 
3
 
4
{Chan} R. Chandrasekaran. Minimal ratio spanning tree. Networks 7, pp. 335--342, 1977.
 
5
{CHSB} D. L. Craft, T. F. Halabi, H. A. Shih, T. R. Bortfeld. Approximating convex Pareto surfaces in multiobjective radiotherapy planning. Med. Phys., 33, pp. 3399--3407, 2006.
 
6
{Cli} J. Climacao, Ed. Multicriteria Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 1997.
 
7
 
8
{CMH} K. Chatterjee, R. Majumdar, T. A. Henzinger. Markov Decision Processes with Multiple Objectives. STACS, 325--336, 2006.
 
9
{DY} I. Diakonikolas, M. Yannakakis. Small Approximate Pareto Sets for Bi-objective Shortest Paths and Other Problems. In Proc. APPROX, 2007.
 
10
 
11
{EG} M. Ehrgott, X. Gandibleux. An annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems. OR Spectrum 42, pp. 425--460, 2000.
 
12
{EKVY} K. Etessami, M. Kwiatkowska, M. Y. Vardi, and M. Yannakakis. Multi-Objective Model Checking of Markov Decision Processes. In Proc. TACAS, 2007.
 
13
{FGE} J. Figueira, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, eds. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, 2005.
 
14
 
15
{Han} P. Hansen. Bicriterion Path Problems. Proc. 3rd Conf. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Theory and Application, pp. 109--127, Springer Verlag LNEMS 177, 1979.
 
16
 
17
{Meg1} N. Meggido. Combinatorial Optimization with Rational Objective Functions. Math of OR, pp. 414--424, 1979.
18
 
19
{Miet} K. M. Miettinen. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization, Kluwer, 1999.
 
20
21
 
22
23
 
24
 
25
{Ru} G. Ruhe. Complexity results for multicriteria and parametric network flows using a pathological graph of Zadeh. Zeitschrift fur Operations Research, 32, pp. 9--27, 1988.
 
26
{RW} S. Ruzika, M. M. Wiecek. Approximation Methods in Multiobjective Programming (Survey paper). J. Opt. Th. and Appl., 126(3), pp. 473--501, 2005.
 
27
{VV} P. Van Mieghen, L. Vandenberghe. Trade-off Curves for QoS Routing. In Proc. INFOCOM, 2006.
 
28
 
29
 
30
{Ze} M. Zeleny. Linear Multiobjective Programming, Springer, 1974.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ilias Diakonikolas: colleagues
Mihalis Yannakakis: colleagues