ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Randolph thesis: CSEd research at the crossroads
Full text PdfPdf (532 KB)
Source
ACM SIGCSE Bulletin archive
Volume 39 ,  Issue 4  (December 2007) table of contents
COLUMN: CS research table of contents
Pages 16-18  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISSN:0097-8418
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 23,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1345375.1345387
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Justus Randolph recently completed a PhD dissertation which is a methodological review of computer science education research. His review is based upon 352 CSEd articles published between 2000 and 2005. While I do not agree with all aspects of Randolph's argument, it is a thought provoking dissertation. It is downloadable from a website [2] and I believe that most people who are active in CSEd Research should read it. To whet your appetite for the entire dissertation, I recommend that you first read the paragraph at the top of page 162, which begins "The typical computer science education research paper is . . ."


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods In Education. London and new York: Routledge/Falmer (5th Edition).
 
2
 
3
Trochim, W. M. K. (2001). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/index.php {Accessed July 2007}.
4