ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Trace-based framework for concurrent development of process and FPGA architecture considering process variation and reliability
Full text PdfPdf (423 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays archive
Proceedings of the 16th international ACM/SIGDA symposium on Field programmable gate arrays table of contents
Monterey, California, USA
SESSION: Architecture tools table of contents
Pages 159-168  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-934-0
Authors
Lerong Cheng  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Yan Lin  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Lei He  University of California, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 101,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1344671.1344696
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper develops a trace-based framework to enable concurrent process and FPGA architecture co-development. Based on process parameters and traces for FPGA applications, the framework calculates the chip level performance and power distribution and soft error rate (SER) with consideration of process variations and device aging. As examples to utilize the framework, the paper further applies heterogeneous gate lengths to logic and interconnects for energy reduction, and studies the interaction between device aging, process variation and SER


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
T. Tuan and B. Lai, "Leakage power analysis of a 90nm FPGA," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., 2003.
2
3
 
4
 
5
F. Li, Y. Lin, L. He, D. Chen, and J. Congs, "Power modeling and characteristics of Field programmable gate arrays," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 24, pp. 1712--1724, Nov. 2005.
 
6
L. Cheng, F. Li, Y. Lin, P. Wong, and L. He, "Device and architecture co-optimization for FPGA power reduction," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 19, pp. 1211--1221, July 2007.
7
8
9
10
 
11
F.L. Yan Lin and L. He, "Circuits and architectures for Field programmable gate array with configurable supply voltage," IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst., 2005.
 
12
Y. Lin and L. He, "Dual-vdd interconnect with chip-level time slack allocation for FPGA power reduction," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 25, Oct. 2006.
 
13
F. Li, Y. Lin, and L. He, "Field programmability of supply voltages for FPGA power reduction," vol. 26, Apr. 2007.
14
 
15
 
16
L. Cheng, J. Xiong, L. He, and M. Hutton, "FPGA performance optimization via chipwise placement considering process variations," in International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications, August 2006.
 
17
Y. Lin, M. Hutton, and L. He, "Placement and timing for FPGAs considering variations," in Proc. Intl. Conf. Field-Programmable Logic and its Application, August 2006.
18
19
 
20
 
21
M. Alam and S. Mahapatra, "A comprehensive model of PMOS NBTI degradation," in Microeletronics Reliability, Aug. 2005.
 
22
S. Mahapatra, D. Saha, D. Varghese, and P. Kumar, "On the generation and recovery of interface traps in MOSFETs subjected to NBTI, fn, and HCI stress," IEEE. Trans. on Electron Device, vol. 53, July 2006.
23
 
24
S. Bhardwaj, W. Wang, R. Vattikonda, Y. Cao, and S. Vrudhula, "Predictive modeling of the NBTI effect for reliable design," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., Sept. 2006.
 
25
K.-L. Chen, S.A. Saller, I.A. Groves, and D.B. Scott, "Reliability effects on MOS transistors due to hot-carrier injection," IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Feb. 1985.
 
26
W. Wang, V. Reddy, A.T. Krishnan, R. Vattikonda, S. Krishnan, and Y. Cao, "An integrated modeling paradigm of circuit reliability for 65nm CMOS technology," in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conf., Sept. 2007.
 
27
P. Hazucha and C. Svensson, "Impact of CMOS technology scaling on the atmospheric neutron soft error rate," IEEE Trans. on Nuclear Science, 2000.
 
28
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor in http://public.itrs.net/, 2005.
 
29
International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor, "A user's guide to MASTAR4," in http://www.itrs.net/models.html, 2005.
 
30
T. Skotnicki, "Heading for decananometer CMOS -- Is navigation among icebergs still a viable strategy?," in Solid-State Device Research Conference, pp. 19--33, September 2000.
 
31
 
32
 
33
S. Yang, "Logic synthesis and optimization benchmarks, version 3.0," tech. rep., Microelectronics Center of North Carolina (MCNC), 1991.
 
34
35
 
36
W. Liao, L. He, and K. Lepak, "Temperature and supply voltage aware performance and power modeling at microarchitecture level," IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, July 2005.
37
 
38