ViewCube: a 3D orientation indicator and controller

ABSTRACT

Literally hundreds of thousands of users of 2D computer-aided design (CAD) tools are in the difficult process of transitioning to 3D CAD tools. A common problem for these users is disorientation in the abstract virtual 3D environments that occur while developing new 3D scenes. To help address this problem, we present a novel in-scene 3D widget called the ViewCube as a 3D orientation indicator and controller. The ViewCube is a cube-shaped widget placed in a corner of the window. When acting as an orientation indicator, the ViewCube turns to reflect the current view direction as the user re-orients the scene using other tools. When used as an orientation controller, the ViewCube can be dragged, or the faces, edges, or corners can be clicked on, to easily orient the scene to the corresponding view. We conducted a formal experiment to measure the performance of the ViewCube comparing: (1) ArcBall-style dragging using the ViewCube for manual view switching, (2) clicking on face/edge/corner elements of the ViewCube for automated view switching and (3) clicking on a dedicated row of buttons for automated view switching. The results indicate that users prefer and are almost twice as fast at using the ViewCube with dragging compared to clicking techniques, independent of a number of ViewCube representations that we examined.

REFERENCES

• 1: Ravin Balakrishnan , Gordon Kurtenbach, Exploring bimanual camera control and object manipulation in 3D graphics interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.56-62, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.302991]
• 2: Patrick Baudisch , Edward Cutrell , Ken Hinckley , Adam Eversole, Snap-and-go: helping users align objects without the modality of traditional snapping, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055014]
• 3: Eric A. Bier, Snap-dragging in three dimensions, Proceedings of the 1990 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.193-204, February 1990, Snowbird, Utah, United States
• 4: Doug A. Bowman , Donald B. Johnson , Larry F. Hodges, Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques, Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, p.26-33, December 20-22, 1999, London, United Kingdom [doi>10.1145/323663.323667]
• 5: Doug A. Bowman , David Koller , Larry F. Hodges, Travel in Immersive Virtual Environments: An Evaluation of Viewpoint Motion Control Techniques, Proceedings of the 1997 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS '97), p.45, March 01-05, 1997
• 6: Olivier Chapuis , Nicolas Roussel, Metisse is not a 3D desktop!, Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 23-26, 2005, Seattle, WA, USA [doi>10.1145/1095034.1095038]
• 7: Luca Chittaro , Stefano Burigat, 3D location-pointing as a navigation aid in Virtual Environments, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, May 25-28, 2004, Gallipoli, Italy [doi>10.1145/989863.989910]
• 8: Michael Gleicher , Andrew Witkin, Through-the-lens camera control, Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.331-340, July 1992
• 9: Tovi Grossman , Ravin Balakrishnan , Gordon Kurtenbach , George Fitzmaurice , Azam Khan , Bill Buxton, Interaction techniques for 3D modeling on large displays, Proceedings of the 2001 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.17-23, March 2001 [doi>10.1145/364338.364341]
• 10: Andrew J. Hanson , Eric A. Wernert, Constrained 3D navigation with 2D controllers, Proceedings of the 8th conference on Visualization '97, p.175-ff., October 18-24, 1997, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
• 11: D. Austin Henderson, Jr. , Stuart Card, Rooms: the use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.3, p.211-243, July 1986 [doi>10.1145/24054.24056]
• 12: Takeo Igarashi , Rieko Kadobayashi , Kenji Mase , Hidehiko Tanaka, Path drawing for 3D walkthrough, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.173-174, November 01-04, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States [doi>10.1145/288392.288599]
• 13: Susanne Jul , George W. Furnas, Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation, Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.97-106, November 01-04, 1998, San Francisco, California, United States [doi>10.1145/288392.288578]
• 14: Azam Khan , Ben Komalo , Jos Stam , George Fitzmaurice , Gordon Kurtenbach, HoverCam: interactive 3D navigation for proximal object inspection, Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics and games, April 03-06, 2005, Washington, District of Columbia [doi>10.1145/1053427.1053439]
• 15: Komerska, R. and Ware, C. 2003. "Haptic-GeoZui3D: Exploring the Use of Haptics in AUV Path Planning", Proceedings 13th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology UUST'03., Durham, NH.
• 16: Jock D. Mackinlay , Stuart K. Card , George G. Robertson, Rapid controlled movement through a virtual 3D workspace, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.24 n.4, p.171-176, Aug. 1990
• 17: Cary B. Phillips , Norman I. Badler , John Granieri, Automatic viewing control for 3D direct manipulation, Proceedings of the 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.71-74, June 1992, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States [doi>10.1145/147156.147167]
• 18: Jeffrey S. Pierce , Matthew Conway , Maarten van Dantzich , George Robertson, Toolspaces and glances: storing, accessing, and retrieving objects in 3D desktop applications, Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.163-168, April 26-29, 1999, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/300523.300545]
• 19: Rezzonico, S. and Thalmann, D. 1996. Browsing 3D Bookmarks in BED, WebNet 1996.
• 20: G. Robertson , S. K. Card , J. D. Mackinlay, The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces, Proceedings of the 2nd annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User interface software and technology, p.10-18, November 13-15, 1989, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States [doi>10.1145/73660.73662]
• 21: B. Shneiderman, Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages, Computer, v.16 n.8, p.57-69, August 1983 [doi>10.1109/MC.1983.1654471]
• 22: Ken Shoemake, ARCBALL: a user interface for specifying three-dimensional orientation using a mouse, Proceedings of the conference on Graphics interface '92, p.151-156, September 1992, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
• 23: Karan Singh , Ravin Balakrishnan, Visualizing 3D scenes using non-linear projections and data mining of previous camera movements, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa, November 03-05, 2004, Stellenbosch, South Africa [doi>10.1145/1029949.1029956]
• 24: Graham Smith , Tim Salzman , Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, 3D scene manipulation with 2D devices and constraints, No description on Graphics interface 2001, p.135-142, June 07-09, 2001, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
• 25: Anthony Steed, Efficient navigation around complex virtual environments, Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, p.173-180, September 1997, Lausanne, Switzerland [doi>10.1145/261135.261167]
• 26: Richard Stoakley , Matthew J. Conway , Randy Pausch, Virtual reality on a WIM: interactive worlds in miniature, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.265-272, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223904.223938]
• 27: Stanislav L. Stoev , Wolfgang Straßer, A case study on automatic camera placement and motion for visualizing historical data, Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '02, October 27-November 01, 2002, Boston, Massachusetts
• 28: Desney S. Tan , George G. Robertson , Mary Czerwinski, Exploring 3D navigation: combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.418-425, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365307]
• 29: Melanie Tory, Mental Registration of 2D and 3D Visualizations (An Empirical Study), Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization 2003 (VIS'03), p.49, October 22-24, 2003 [doi>10.1109/VISUAL.2003.1250396]
• 30: Tory, M. and Swindells, C. 2003. Comparing ExoVis, Orientation Icon, and In-Place 3D Visualization Techniques. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pp. 57--64.
• 31: Colin Ware , Daniel Fleet, Context sensitive flying interface, Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.127-ff., April 27-30, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island, United States [doi>10.1145/253284.253319]
• 32: Colin Ware , Steven Osborne, Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments, Proceedings of the 1990 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.175-183, February 1990, Snowbird, Utah, United States
• 33: Robert Zeleznik , Andrew Forsberg, UniCam—2D gestural camera controls for 3D environments, Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.169-173, April 26-29, 1999, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/300523.300546]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

Keywords:
3D navigation, 3D widgets, desktop 3D environments, virtual camera