ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Transformation of SBVR business design to UML models
Full text PdfPdf (664 KB)
Source
India Software Engineering Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1st conference on India software engineering conference table of contents
Hyderabad, India
SESSION: Modeling and design table of contents
Pages 29-38  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-917-3
Authors
Amit Raj  Unisys Global Services India, Bangalore, India
T. V. Prabhakar  Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
Stan Hendryx  Hendryx and Associates, Sunnyvale, CA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 129,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1342211.1342221
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a methodology for transforming business designs written in OMG's standard Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Rules (SBVR) framework, into a set of UML models. It involves the transformation of business vocabulary and rules written in SBVR's "Structured English" into a set of UML diagrams, which includes Activity Diagram(AD), Sequence Diagram(SD), and Class Diagram(CD). This transformation works by detecting the distinction between rules which will participate in the construction of Activity Diagram and rules which do not. These rules are imperative in nature. The work in the paper also includes the detection of activities embedded implicitly in those rules and establishment of sequence between those activities. These activities incur some action. We also detect their owner and refer to them as the doer of the action. This plays a very important role in the development of Class Diagrams


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Business motivation model. URL:http://www.omg.org/docs/dtc/06-08-03.pdf.
 
2
Digital business ecosystem project, "an internet based software environment in which business applications can be developed and used". Project. URL: http://www.digital-ecosystem.org/.
 
3
Open philosophies of associative autopoietic digital ecosystems (opaals). Network of Excellence, funded by the European Union's 6th Framework Programme of research.
 
4
Meta object facility specification, 2002. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf.
 
5
Model driven architecture specification. Specification, Object Management Group, 2003. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf.
 
6
Object constraint language specification, 2003. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-10-14.pdf.
 
7
Executable uml specification. Object Management Group, May 2004.
 
8
Unified modeling language specification. Specification, Object Management Group, 2004. URL: http://doc.omg.org/ptc/2004-10-05.
 
9
Production rules representation. Specification, Object Management Group, 2005. URL: http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rulesws/slides/paulvincent.pdf.
 
10
Semantics of business vocabulary and rules specification. Object Management Group, March 2006.
 
11
F. Bry and P. lavinia Patranjan. Use cases for reactivity on web: Using eca rules for business process modeling. Report, INSTITUT FUR INFORMATIK der Ludwig-Maximilian-Universitat Munchen, 2006. URL: http://www.pms.ifi.lmu.de/publikationen/diplomarbeiten/Inna.Romanenko/DA Inna.Romanenko.pdf.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
M. H. Linehan. Semantics in model-driven business design. Models/UML Conference, 2001.
 
17
D. T. Maurizio and C. Pierpaolo. Sbeaver business modeler editor. URL: http://sbeaver.sourceforge.net/.
 
18
M. Schacher. Moving from zachman row 2 to zachman row 3. Business Rules Journal, 7(6), June 2006.
 
19
P. Selonen, K. Koskimies, and M. Sakkinen. Transformation between uml diagrams. Journal of Database Management, 14(3):37--55, 2003.
 
20
D. Sorensen, A. Pastiak, A. Mitra, and A. Gupta. Integrating ontology into sbvr. Report 1033, Eller College of Management, 2006. URL: http://www.knowgravity.com/pdfe/CASSANDRA_xUML_E.pdf.
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
Amit Raj: colleagues
T. V. Prabhakar: colleagues
Stan Hendryx: colleagues