ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A Framework for Identifying Compromised Nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks
Full text PdfPdf (540 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 11 ,  Issue 3  (March 2008) table of contents
Article No. 12  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Qing Zhang  North Carolina State University
Ting Yu  North Carolina State University
Peng Ning  North Carolina State University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 33,   Downloads (12 Months): 292,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1341731.1341733
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sensor networks are often subject to physical attacks. Once a node's cryptographic key is compromised, an attacker may completely impersonate it and introduce arbitrary false information into the network. Basic cryptographic mechanisms are often not effective in this situation. Most techniques to address this problem focus on detecting and tolerating false information introduced by compromised nodes. They cannot pinpoint exactly where the false information is introduced and who is responsible for it.

In this article, we propose an application-independent framework for accurately identifying compromised sensor nodes. The framework provides an appropriate abstraction of application-specific detection mechanisms and models the unique properties of sensor networks. Based on the framework, we develop alert reasoning algorithms to identify compromised nodes. The algorithm assumes that compromised nodes may collude at will. We show that our algorithm is optimal in the sense that it identifies the largest number of compromised nodes without introducing false positives. We evaluate the effectiveness of the designed algorithm through comprehensive experiments.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Camtepe, S. and Yener, B. 2004. Combinatorial design of key distribution mechanisms for wireless sensor networks. In 9th European Symposium On Research in Computer Security (ESORICS'04).
 
5
 
6
Crossbow Technology Inc. 2003. MTS/MDA Sensor and Data Acquisition Boards User Manual.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
11
 
12
Deng, J., Han, R., and Mishra, S. 2004. A robust and light-weight routing mechanism for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Dependability Issues in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks and Sensor Networks (DIWANS).
 
13
Du, W., Deng, J., Han, Y. S., and Varshney, P. K. 2003a. A witness-based approach for data fusion assurance in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).
14
 
15
16
 
17
Fuhrman, C. P. 1996. Comparison-based diagnosis in faulttolerant, multiprocessor systems. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL).
18
 
19
Golbeck, J. and Hendler, J. 2004. Accuracy of metrics for inferring trust and reputation in semantic Web-based social networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW). Northamptonshire, U.K.
 
20
Ho, T., Leong, B., Koetter, R., Medard, M., Effros, M., and Karger, D. 2004. Byzantine modification detection in multicast networks using randomized network coding. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).
 
21
22
 
23
24
 
25
Lawrence, R., Sergey, B., Rajeev, M., and Terry, W. 1998. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the Web. Tech. rep., Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.
 
26
Lee, S., Sherwood, R., and Bhattacharjee, B. 2003. Cooperative peer groups in NICE. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies (INFOCOM).
27
 
28
Liu, D., Ning, P., and Du, W. 2003. Efficient distribution of key chain commitments for broadcast authentication in distributed sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS'03).
 
29
30
 
31
 
32
Micali, S. and Vazirani, V. 1980. An √|V||e| algorithm for finding maximum matchings in general graphs. In Proceedings of the 21st Symp. Foundations of Computing.
 
33
 
34
35
 
36
Preparata, F. P., Metze, G., and Chien, R. T. 1967. On the connection assignment problem of diagosable systems. IEEE Trans. Electron. Comput. 16, 6, 848--854.
37
 
38
Richardson, M., Agrawal, R., and Domingos, P. 2003. Trust management for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference.
 
39
 
40
 
41
Xiong, L. and Liu, L. 2002. Building trust in decentralized peer-to-peer electronic communities. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce Research (ICECR).
 
42
Ye, F., Luo, H., Lu, S., and Zhang, L. 2004. Statistical en-route filtering of injected false data in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies (INFOCOM).
43
 
44
Zhang, Q., Yu, T., and Ning, P. 2006. A framework for identifying compromised nodes in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Communications Society/CreateNet International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm'06).
 
45
Zhu, S., Setia, S., Jajodia, S., and Ning, P. 2004. An interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme for filtering of injected false data in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 260--272.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Qing Zhang: colleagues
Ting Yu: colleagues
Peng Ning: colleagues