ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Aggregation methods for large-scale sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (606 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 2  (March 2008) table of contents
Article No. 9  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1550-4859
Authors
Laukik Chitnis  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Alin Dobra  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Sanjay Ranka  University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 29,   Downloads (12 Months): 318,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1340771.1340775
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The ability to efficiently aggregate information—for example compute the average temperature—in large networks is crucial for the successful employment of sensor networks. This article addresses the problem of designing truly scalable protocols for computing aggregates in the presence of faults, protocols that can enable million node sensor networks to work efficiently. More precisely, we make four distinct contributions. First, we introduce a simple fault model and analyze the behavior of two existing protocols under the fault model: tree aggregation and gossip aggregation. Second, since the behavior of the two protocols depends on the size of the network and probability of failure, we introduce a hybrid approach that can leverage the strengths of the two protocols and minimize the weaknesses; the new protocol is analyzed under the same fault model. Third, we propose methodology for determining the optimal mix between the two basic protocols; the methodology consists in formulating an optimization problem, using models of the protocol behavior, and solving it. Fourth, we perform extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the hybrid protocol and show that it usually performs better, sometimes orders of magnitude better, than both the tree and gossip aggregation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Amis, A. D., Prakash, R., Huynh, D., and Vuong, T. 2000. Max-min d-cluster formation in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM (Tel Aviv, Israel). 32--41.
 
2
Bandyopadhyay, S. and Coyle, E. 2003. An energy efficient hierarchical clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Infocom 2003). Vol. 3. Springer-Verlag, San Franciso, CA, 1713--1723.
 
3
Bawa, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Gionis, A., and Motwani, R. 2003. Estimating aggregates on a peer-to-peer network. Tech. rep. Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
 
4
Chen, J.-Y., Pandurangan, G., and Xu, D. 2005. Robust aggregates computation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
 
5
Ding, M., Cheng, X., and Xue, G. 2003. Aggregation tree construction in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Vehicular Technology Conference (Orlando, FL).
 
6
Fiedler, M. 1973. Algebraic connectivity of graphs. Czechoslovak Math. J. 23, 98, 298--305.
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
Hu, Y. 2005. A guided simulation methodology for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Univeristy of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD.
 
13
Jia, L., Noubir, G., Rajaraman, R., and Sundaram, R. 2006. Group-independent spanning tree for data aggregation in dense sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). San Francisco, CA.
14
 
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
 
22
 
23
Polley, J., Blazakis, D., McGee, J., Rusk, D., and Baras, J. S. 2004. Atemu: A fine-grained sensor network simulator. In SECON'04, The First IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (Santa Clara, CA).
 
24
 
25
Shao, J. 2003. Mathematical Statistics, 2 ed. Springer Texts in Statistics, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
26
 
27
 
28
 
29


Collaborative Colleagues:
Laukik Chitnis: colleagues
Alin Dobra: colleagues
Sanjay Ranka: colleagues