ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Authority-based keyword search in databases
Full text PdfPdf (2.58 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) archive
Volume 33 ,  Issue 1  (March 2008) table of contents
Article No. 1  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0362-5915
Authors
Vagelis Hristidis  Florida International University, Miami, FL
Heasoo Hwang  University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Yannis Papakonstantinou  University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 31,   Downloads (12 Months): 304,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1331904.1331905
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Our system applies authority-based ranking to keyword search in databases modeled as labeled graphs. Three ranking factors are used: the relevance to the query, the specificity and the importance of the result. All factors are handled using authority-flow techniques that exploit the link-structure of the data graph, in contrast to traditional Information Retrieval. We address the performance challenges in computing the authority flows in databases by using precomputation and exploiting the database schema if present. We conducted user surveys and performance experiments on multiple real and synthetic datasets, to assess the semantic meaningfulness and performance of our system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
 
9
10
 
11
12
 
13
Croft, W. B. 2000. Combining approaches to information retrieval. In Advances in Information Retrieval: Recent Research from the CIIR, Chapter 1, Kluwer.
 
14
 
15
Doyle, P. G. and Snell, J. L. 1984. Random Walks and Electric Networks. Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC.
 
16
17
18
 
19
 
20
Golub, G. H. and Loan, C. F. 1996. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins.
 
21
Gu, X., Nahrstedt, K., Yuan, W., Wichadakul, D., and Xu, D. 2002. An XML-based quality of service enabling language for the web. J. Visual Langu. Comput. 13, 1, 61--95.
22
 
23
 
24
Haveliwala, T. 1999. Efficient computation of PageRank. Tech. rep. Stanford University (http://www.stanford.edu/~taherh/papers/efficient-pr.pdf).
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
Hristidis, V., Papakonstantinou, Y., and Balmin, A. 2003. Keyword proximity search on XML graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).
 
29
Huang, A., Xue, Q., and Yang, J. 2003. TupleRank and implicit relationship discovery in relational databases. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Age Information Management (WAIM).
30
31
32
33
 
34
 
35
36
 
37
Richardson, M. and Domingos, P. 2002. The intelligent surfer: Probabilistic combination of link and content information in PageRank. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, MIT Press.
 
38
 
39
 
40
Shafer, P., Isganitis, T., and Yona, G. 2006. Hubs of knowledge: Using the functional link structure in Biozon to mine for biologically significant entities. BMC Bioinformatics. 15, 7, 71.
 
41
Singhal, A. 2001. Modern information retrieval: A brief overview. IEEE Data Engin. Bull., Special Issue on Text and Databases 24, 4.
42



REVIEW

"Donald Harris Kraft : Reviewer"

Hristidis et al. extend the notion of ranking retrieved textual items from a database via Google's PageRank by giving authority to the "citing" papers and to the "citing" authors. The basic data structure is a labeled directed graph. A demonstrati  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Vagelis Hristidis: colleagues
Heasoo Hwang: colleagues
Yannis Papakonstantinou: colleagues