ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process
Full text PdfPdf (969 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval table of contents
Copenhagen, Denmark
Pages: 23 - 36  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-523-2
Author
Jean Tague-Sutcliffe  School of Library and Information Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H1
Sponsors
Royal School of Lib. : Royal School of Lib.
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/133160.133171
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of information retrieval systems should be based on measures of the information provided by the retrieval process, “informativeness” measures which take into account the interactive and full-text nature of present-day systems and the different types of questions which are asked of them. Desirable properties for an informativeness measure are developed, including context sensitivity, user centrality, and logarithmic response. A hypergraph-based framework for measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process is presented and a measure developed which satisfies the desired properties. The measure is compared to previously developed information measures and illustrated via an application.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bar-Hilel, Y. and Carnap, R., "Semantic information, " British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4(13) , 1953, 147-57.
 
2
Belkin, N., "Information concepts for information science," Journal of Documentation 34(1), 1978, 55- 85.
 
3
Buckland, M., "Information as Thing," Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42(5), 1991, 351-60.
 
4
Eisenberg, M. and Barry, C., "Order effects- a study of the possible influence of presentation order on user judgments of document relevance." Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39(5), 1988, 293-300.
 
5
Fox, C.J., Information and Misinformation: an Investiqation of the Notions of information, Misinformation. Informinq. and Misinforming, Greenwood Pr., 1983.
 
6
 
7
May, K.O., "Growth and quality of the mathematical literature," ISIS 59(199), winter, 1968, 363-371.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Shreider, Y., "On the semantic characteristics of information," Information Storaqe and Retrieval 2(4), 1965, 221-233.
 
11
12
 
13
Wells, R. "A measure of subjective information, " in Structure of Languaqe and Its Mathematical Aspects; Proceedings of Svmposia in Applied Mathematics 12, 1961, 237-244.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jean Tague-Sutcliffe: colleagues