ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The Traust Authorization Service
Full text PdfPdf (1.58 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security (TISSEC) archive
Volume 11 ,  Issue 1  (February 2008) table of contents
Article No. 2  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1094-9224
Authors
Adam J. Lee  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Marianne Winslett  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jim Basney  National Center for Supercomputing Applications
Von Welch  National Center for Supercomputing Applications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 199,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1330295.1330297
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years, trust negotiation has been proposed as a novel authorization solution for use in open-system environments, in which resources are shared across organizational boundaries. Researchers have shown that trust negotiation is indeed a viable solution for these environments by developing a number of policy languages and strategies for trust negotiation that have desirable theoretical properties. Further, existing protocols, such as TLS, have been altered to interact with prototype trust negotiation systems, thereby illustrating the utility of trust negotiation. Unfortunately, modifying existing protocols is often a time-consuming and bureaucratic process that can hinder the adoption of this promising technology.

In this paper, we present Traust, a third-party authorization service that leverages the strengths of existing prototype trust negotiation systems. Traust acts as an authorization broker that issues access tokens for resources in an open system after entities use trust negotiation to satisfy the appropriate resource access policies. The Traust architecture was designed to allow Traust to be integrated either directly with newer trust-aware applications or indirectly with existing legacy applications; this flexibility paves the way for the incremental adoption of trust negotiation technologies without requiring widespread software or protocol upgrades. We discuss the design and implementation of Traust, the communication protocol used by the Traust system, and its performance. We also discuss our experiences using Traust to broker access to legacy resources, our proposal for a Traust-aware version of the GridFTP protocol, and Traust's resilience to attack.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Allcock, W. 2003. GridFTP protocol specification. Global Grid Forum Recommendation GFD.20. ⟨http://www.globus.org/alliance/publications/papers/GFD-R.0201.pdf⟩.
 
2
Basney, J. 2005. MyProxy protocol. Global Grid Forum Experimental Document GFD-E.54.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
Blakley, G. R. 1979. Safeguarding cryptographic keys. In AFIPS Conference Proceedings. Vol. 48. 313--317.
11
12
13
 
14
 
15
Dolev, D. and Yao, A. C. 1983. On the security of public key protocols. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-29, 2 (March) 198--208.
 
16
17
 
18
Hess, A., Jacobson, J., Mills, H., Wamsley, R., Seamons, K. E., and Smith, B. 2002. Advanced client/server authentication in TLS. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium. 203--214.
19
 
20
ISRL. 2005. Internet security research lab--projects. ⟨http://isrl.cs.byu.edu/TrustBuilder.html⟩.
 
21
Koshutanski, H. and Massacci, F. 2004a. Interactive access control for web services. In Proceedings of the 19th IFIP Information Security Conference (SEC). 151--166.
 
22
Koshutanski, H. and Massacci, F. 2004b. Interactive trust management and negotiation scheme. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST). 139--152.
 
23
Koshutanski, H. and Massacci, F. 2005. Interactive credential negotiation for stateful business processes. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management (iTrust). 257--273.
 
24
Lee, A. J. and Winslett, M. 2006. Virtual fingerprinting as a foundation for reputation in open systems. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Trust Management (iTrust'06). Number 3986 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 236--251.
25
26
 
27
Li, N. and Mitchell, J. C. 2003. RT: A role-based trust-management framework. In Proceedings of the 3rd DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition. 201--212.
 
28
 
29
 
30
Minami, K. and Kotz, D. 2006. Scalability in a secure distributed proof system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing. 220--237.
 
31
32
 
33
34
 
35
 
36
37
 
38
Sahai, A. and Waters, B. 2005. Fuzzy identity based encryption. In Proceedings of Eurocrypt. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3494, Springer, 457--473.
 
39
Saltzer, J. H. and Schroeder, M. D. 1975. The protection of information in computer systems. In Proceedings of IEEE 63, 9 (Sept.) 1278--1308.
40
 
41
Tuecke, S., Welch, V., Engert, D., Pearlman, L., and Thompson, M. 2004. Internet X.509 public key infrastructure (PKI) proxy certificate profile. IETF Request for Comments RFC-3820.
42
 
43
 
44
 
45
Winsborough, W. H., Seamons, K. E., and Jones, V. E. 2000. Automated trust negotiation. In Proceedings of the DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition. 88--102.
 
46
47
 
48
Ylonen, T. and Lonvick, C. 2005. SSH transport layer protocol. IETF Network Working Group Internet-Draft.
49
50


Collaborative Colleagues:
Adam J. Lee: colleagues
Marianne Winslett: colleagues
Jim Basney: colleagues
Von Welch: colleagues