ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Forecasting market prices in a supply chain game
Full text PdfPdf (337 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Agent learning, evolution, and adaptation: full papers table of contents
Article No. 234  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-81-904262-7-5
Authors
Christopher Kiekintveld  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Jason Miller  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Patrick R. Jordan  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Michael P. Wellman  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsor
: IFAAMAS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1329125.1329408
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Future market conditions can be a pivotal factor in making business decisions. We present and evaluate methods used by our agent, Deep Maize, to forecast market prices in the Trading Agent Competition Supply Chain Management Game. As a guiding principle we seek to exploit as many sources of available information as possible to inform predictions. Since information comes in several different forms, we integrate well-known methods in a novel way to make predictions. The core of our predictor is a nearest-neighbors machine learning algorithm that identifies historical instances with similar economic indicators. We augment this with an online learning procedure that transforms the predictions by optimizing a scoring rule. This allows us to select more relevant historical contexts using additional information available during individual games. We also explore the advantages of two different representations for predicting price distributions. One uses absolute prices, and the other uses statistics of price time series to exploit local stability. We evaluate these methods using both data from the 2005 tournament final round and additional simulations. We compare several variations of our predictor to one another and a baseline predictor similar to those used by many other tournament agents. We show substantial improvements over the baseline predictor, and demonstrate that each element of our predictor contributes to improved performance.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. Alon, M. Qi, and R. J. Sandowski. Forecasting aggregate retail sales: A comparison of artificial neural networks and traditional methods. Retailing and Consumer Services, 8:147--156, 2001.
 
2
J. M. Bates and C. W. J. Granger. The combination of forecasts. Operations Research, 20(4):451--468, 1969.
3
4
 
5
P. J. Brockwell and R. A. Davis. Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
 
6
D. A. Burke, K. N. Brown, B. Hnich, and A. Tarim. Learning market prices for a real-time supply chain management trading agent. In AAMAS-06 Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, 2006.
 
7
C. Chatfield. Time-Series Forecasting. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2001.
 
8
 
9
R. T. Clemen and R. L. Winkler. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 19(2):187--203, 1999.
 
10
J. Collins, R. Arunachalam, N. Sadeh, J. Eriksson, N. Finne, and S. Janson. The supply chain management game for the 2005 trading agent competition. Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-139, Carnegie Mellon University, 2004.
 
11
 
12
 
13
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
14
 
15
W. Ketter, J. Collins, M. Gini, A. Gupta, and P. Schrater. Identifying and forecasting economic regimes in TAC SCM. In IJCAI-05 workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, 2005.
16
 
17
C. Kiekintveld, Y. Vorobeychik, and M. P. Wellman. An analysis of the 2004 supply chain management trading agent competition. In IJCAI 2005 Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis, 2005.
 
18
C. Kiekintveld, M. P. Wellman, S. Singh, J. Estelle, Y. Vorobeychik, V. Soni, and M. Rudary. Distributed feedback control for decision making on supply chains. In Fourteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, pages 384--392, 2004.
 
19
F. J. Nogales, J. Contreras, A. J. Conejo, and R. Espinola. Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(2):342--348, 2002.
 
20
D. Pardoe and P. Stone. Bidding for customer orders in TAC SCM. In Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce VI: Theories for and Engineering of Distributed Mechanisms and Systems (AMEC 2004), 2005.
 
21
D. Pardoe and P. Stone. An autonomous agent for supply chain mangement. Technical report, University of Texas, 2006.
 
22
D. Pardoe and P. Stone. Predictive planning for supply chain management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, June 2006.
 
23
P. Stone, R. E. Schapire, M. L. Littman, J. A. Csirik, and D. McAllester. Decision-theoretic bidding based on learned density models in simultaneous, interacting auctions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 19:209--242, 2003.
24
 
25
M. P. Wellman, D. M. Reeves, K. M. Lochner, and Y. Vorobeychik. Price prediction in a trading agent competition. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21:19--36, 2004.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Christopher Kiekintveld: colleagues
Jason Miller: colleagues
Patrick R. Jordan: colleagues
Michael P. Wellman: colleagues