ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Infinitesimal nash transfers for resource allocation in strong social alliances
Full text PdfPdf (189 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Auctions and electronic markets: poster papers table of contents
Article No. 107  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-81-904262-7-5
Authors
Paul-Amaury Matt  Imperial College London, London, UK
Francesca Toni  Imperial College London, London, UK
Sponsor
: IFAAMAS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1329125.1329257
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We introduce a distributed and tractable mechanism for the allocation of continuously divisible resources to agents, that locally maximises the (Nash) product of their individual welfare. The mechanism involves specific m-resources-at-a-time multilateral deals over bits of resources, termed infinitesimal Nash transfers. It provides an effective way of building "strong social alliances", where in a social alliance agents fully cooperate for the global interest of society, and a strong social alliance has near-optimal utilitarian and egalitarian social welfare, as understood in social choice and welfare economics. The mechanism is scalable, can be distributed amongst agents and can be used to support, e.g., fair trade.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
U. Endriss, N. Maudet, F. Sadri, and F. Toni. Negotiating socially optimal allocations of resources. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 25:315--348, 2006.
 
3
J. Harsanyi. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1977.
 
4
P.-A. Matt and F. Toni. The distributed negotiation of egalitarian allocations. In 1st International Workshop on Computational Social Choice, 2006.
 
5
P.-A. Matt and F. Toni. Egalitarian allocations of indivisible resources: theory and computation. In Cooperative Information Agents, 2006.
 
6
J. Nash. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21:1:128--140, 1953.
 
7
J. Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, 1971.
 
8
G. Zlotkin and J. S. Rosenschein. Negotiation and task sharing among autonomous agents in cooperative domains. In IJCAI, pages 912--917, 1989.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Paul-Amaury Matt: colleagues
Francesca Toni: colleagues