ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Bidding optimally in concurrent second-price auctions of perfectly substitutable goods
Full text PdfPdf (437 KB)
Source
International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems table of contents
Honolulu, Hawaii
SESSION: Applications and computational environments: full papers table of contents
Article No. 53  
Year of Publication: 2007
ISBN:978-81-904262-7-5
Authors
Enrico H. Gerding  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Rajdeep K. Dash  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
David C. K. Yuen  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Nicholas R. Jennings  University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Sponsor
: IFAAMAS
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 32,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1329125.1329188
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We derive optimal bidding strategies for a global bidding agent that participates in multiple, simultaneous second-price auctions with perfect substitutes. We first consider a model where all other bidders are local and participate in a single auction. For this case, we prove that, assuming free disposal, the global bidder should always place non-zero bids in all available auctions, irrespective of the local bidders' valuation distribution. Furthermore, for non-decreasing valuation distributions, we prove that the problem of finding the optimal bids reduces to two dimensions. These results hold both in the case where the number of local bidders is known and when this number is determined by a Poisson distribution. This analysis extends to online markets where, typically, auctions occur both concurrently and sequentially. In addition, by combining analytical and simulation results, we demonstrate that similar results hold in the case of several global bidders, provided that the market consists of both global and local bidders. Finally, we address the efficiency of the overall market, and show that information about the number of local bidders is an important determinant for the way in which a global bidder affects efficiency.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
S. Airiau and S. Sen. Strategic bidding for multiple units in simultaneous and sequential auctions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(5):397--413, 2003.
 
2
 
3
R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans and R. Weber. An example of a multiobject auction game. Management Science, 25:1272--1277, 1979.
 
4
D. Fudenberg and D. Levine. The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT Press, 1999.
5
 
6
V. Krishna. Auction Theory. Academic Press, 2002.
 
7
V. Krishna and R. Rosenthal. Simultaneous auctions with synergies. Games and Economic Behaviour, 17:1--31, 1996.
 
8
K. Lang and R. Rosenthal. The contractor's game. RAND J. Econ, 22:329--338, 1991.
 
9
R. Rosenthal and R. Wang. Simultaneous auctions with synergies and common values. Games and Economic Behaviour, 17:32--55, 1996.
 
10
A. Roth and A. Ockenfels. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from ebay and amazon auctions on the internet. The American Economic Review, 92(4):1093--1103, 2002.
 
11
O. Shehory. Optimal bidding in multiple concurrent auctions. Int. Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 11:315--327, 2002.
 
12
B. Szentes and R. Rosenthal. Three-object two-bidder simultaeous auctions:chopsticks and tetrahedra. Games and Economic Behaviour, 44:114--133, 2003.
 
13
D. Yuen, A. Byde, and N. R. Jennings. Heuristic bidding strategies for multiple heterogeneous auctions. In Proc. 17th European Conference on AI (ECAI), pages 300--304, 2006.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Enrico H. Gerding: colleagues
Rajdeep K. Dash: colleagues
David C. K. Yuen: colleagues
Nicholas R. Jennings: colleagues