ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use
Full text PdfPdf (967 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 1  (February 2008) table of contents
Article No. 5  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1559-1131
Authors
Harald Weinreich  University of Hamburg, Germany
Hartmut Obendorf  University of Hamburg, Germany
Eelco Herder  University of Hannover
Matthias Mayer  University of Hamburg, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 97,   Downloads (12 Months): 963,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1326561.1326566
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, the World Wide Web has been subject to dramatic changes. Web sites have evolved from static information resources to dynamic and interactive applications that are used for a broad scope of activities on a daily basis. To examine the consequences of these changes on user behavior, we conducted a long-term client-side Web usage study with twenty-five participants. This report presents results of this study and compares the user behavior with previous long-term browser usage studies, which range in age from seven to thirteen years. Based on the empirical data and the interview results, various implications for the interface design of browsers and Web sites are discussed.

A major finding is the decreasing prominence of backtracking in Web navigation. This can largely be attributed to the increasing importance of dynamic, service-oriented Web sites. Users do not navigate on these sites searching for information, but rather interact with an online application to complete certain tasks. Furthermore, the usage of multiple windows and tabs has partly replaced back button usage, posing new challenges for user orientation and backtracking. We found that Web browsing is a rapid activity even for pages with substantial content, which calls for page designs that allow for cursory reading. Click maps provide additional information on how users interact with the Web on page level. Finally, substantial differences were observed between users, and characteristic usage patterns for different types of Web sites emphasize the need for more adaptive and customizable Web browsers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Baker, K. R. 2003. The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News 5, 1. http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/51/paging_scrolling.htm.
3
 
4
Bernard, M., Baker, K. R., and Fernandez, M. 2002. Paging vs. scrolling: Looking for the best way to present search results. Usability News 4, 1. http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/paging.htm.
 
5
Capra, R. and Pérez-Quiñones, M. 2003. Re-finding found things: An exploratory study of how users re-find information. Tech. Rep. cs.HC/0310011, Computing Research Repository (CoRR).
 
6
 
7
Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 1999. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/.
 
8
 
9
Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., and Turnbull, D. 2000. Information seeking on the Web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday Online J. 5, 2. http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_2/choo/index.html.
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
ECMA-262. 1999. ECMAScript language definition. ECMA International. http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ecma-st/ECMA-262.pdf
15
 
16
Greenberg, S. and Cockburn, A. 1999. Getting back to back: Alternate behaviors for a Web browser's back button. In Proceedings of 5th Human Factors and the Web Conference, Austin, TX.
 
17
Haas, S. W. and Grams, E. S. 1998. A link taxonomy for Web pages. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Information Access in the Global Information Economy (ASIS'98). Information Today, Medford, NJ, 485--495.
18
 
19
Herder, E. 2006. Forward, back and home again---analyzing user behavior on the web. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
 
20
Hoffman, M. 1997. Enabling extremely rapid navigation in your web or document, 2nd Version, (Dec.) http://www.hypertextnavigation.com/infoaxcs.htm.
 
21
Hyams, J. and Sellen, A. 2003. Gathering and sharing web-based information: Implications for ePerson concepts. HP Labs: Tech. rep. HPL-2003-19.
 
22
Hyatt, D. 2001. XML user interface language (XUL) 1.0. technical specification, Mozilla project. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/xul.html.
 
23
ISO 9241/110. 2006. Ergonomics of human-system interaction---Part 110: Dialogue principles. International Standards Organization.
 
24
 
25
 
26
27
28
 
29
Kehoe, C., Pitkow, J., Sutton, K., Aggarwal, G., and Rogers, J. 1998. 10th GVU WWW user survey. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-10.
30
31
 
32
 
33
 
34
Meschkat, S. and Mittleman, J. 2007. Keeping the Web in Web 2.0: An HCI approach to designing Web applications. CHI 2007 Course, http://ajaxchi.googlepages.com/.
35
 
36
Morkes, J. and Nielsen, J. 1997. Concise, SCANNABLE, and objective: How to write for the web, Sun Microsystems. http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.html.
 
37
 
38
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R. and Tenopir, C. 2006. What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals: Case study OhioLINK, J. Document. 62, 4, 482--508
 
39
Nielsen, J. 1997. The tyranny of the page: Continued lack of decent navigation support in version 4 browsers. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9711a.html.
 
40
Nielsen, J. 2004. The need for Web design standards. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040913.html.
 
41
Nielsen, J. 2005. Ten best intranets of 2005. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050228.html.
 
42
Nielsen, J. 2006. F-shaped pattern for reading web content. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html.
 
43
Nielsen, J. 2006b. Screen resolution and page layout. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/screen_resolution.html.
44
45
 
46
Ottaway, M. 2004. Nielsen/Netratings data support TVNZ's widescreen Web decision. Nielsen/Netratings. http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040504_nz.pdf.
 
47
Outing, S. and Ruel, L. 2004. The best of Eyetrack III: What we saw when we looked through their eyes. Eyetrack III, http://www.poynterextra.org/eyetrack2004/main.htm.
 
48
Peterson, E. 2004. Which screen resolution should you be using? Jupiterresearch Analyst Weblogs. http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/peterson/archives/003965.html.
 
49
50
 
51
52
 
53
Shrestha, S. and Lenz, K. 2007. Eye gaze patterns while searching vs. browsing a Website. Usability News 9, 1, January 2007, Software Usability Research Lab, Wichita State University.
 
54
 
55
 
56
57
58
 
59
The Counter, 2007. Global Screen Resolution Statistics. Jupitermedia Corporation.
 
60
University of Southern California. 2007. Digital Future Report. Annenberg School, Center for the Digital Future. http://www.digitalcenter.org/pages/current_report.asp?intGlobalId=19.
 
61
Weinreich, H. and Lamersdorf, W. 2003. Eine Umfrage zu Link- und Objekt-Attributen im Web. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer. Stuttgart, Germany. Teubner Verlag, 387--390. http://vsis-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.de/getDoc.php/publications/121/weinreich-umfrage-2003.pdf.
 
62
Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., and Herder, E. 2006. Data cleaning methods for client and proxy logs. In Proceedings of the Workshop of the World Wide Web Conference. Edinburgh, UK. http://torch.cs.dal.ca/~www2006/Workshop_submissions.html.
63


Collaborative Colleagues:
Harald Weinreich: colleagues
Hartmut Obendorf: colleagues
Eelco Herder: colleagues
Matthias Mayer: colleagues